* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] [not found] ` <86c36f9b-f633-3354-d676-7693f35dae0d-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-05-26 1:23 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f@gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-05-26 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Hello, On 05/26/17 at 12:49am, Maniaxx wrote: > PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) > [regression] > > Commit: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7b0a911478c74ca02581d496f732c10e811e894f > > Kernel 4.10 and below are ok. 4.11 and 4.12rc2.r62.g2426125ab4eb freeze. > Reverting the commit on 4.11 fixes the problem. Hardware report and > earlyprintk output on the bugtracker. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195633 > > earlyprintk (text version): > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713322#p1713322 > > Discussions on Arch Linux Forum: > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713344 > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=226490 > Can you try below patch see if it works for you? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/15/940 Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f@gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] [not found] ` <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-05-27 5:14 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <20170527051427.GA3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-05-27 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Seems efi list was dropped, it if is intended not to cc public list please let me know. On 05/26/17 at 03:04pm, Maniaxx wrote: > On 26.05.2017 at 03:23 wrote Dave Young: > > Hello, > > > > On 05/26/17 at 12:49am, Maniaxx wrote: > >> PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) > >> [regression] > >> > >> Commit: > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7b0a911478c74ca02581d496f732c10e811e894f > >> > >> Kernel 4.10 and below are ok. 4.11 and 4.12rc2.r62.g2426125ab4eb freeze. > >> Reverting the commit on 4.11 fixes the problem. Hardware report and > >> earlyprintk output on the bugtracker. > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195633 > >> > >> earlyprintk (text version): > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713322#p1713322 > >> > >> Discussions on Arch Linux Forum: > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713344 > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=226490 > >> > > Can you try below patch see if it works for you? > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/15/940 > > > > Thanks > > Dave > > > Hello, > doesn't work. Probably because the condition isn't met (i do have an EFI > system). At least 4 people reported the problem and if i see it right > all of them have Asus/Asrock boards. The BGRT init (at least on my side) > always crashed with an Oops (on 4.10 and below) but never panic'd/froze. Can you double check it works before the commit of below? If machine boots fine then check /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/image see if it exists or not. One possible reason is bgrt init code bail out for some reason but not in new code. If old code boots fine but without correct /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/* then probably you can debug why it is not created then we can get some clue about this report. BTW if you can manange to save full kernel log it would be also helpful. commit 7b0a911478c74ca02581d496f732c10e811e894f Author: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue Jan 31 13:21:40 2017 +0000 efi/x86: Move the EFI BGRT init code to early init code > > -Maniaxx > Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20170527051427.GA3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] [not found] ` <20170527051427.GA3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-05-27 5:34 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <20170527053457.GB3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-05-27 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 05/27/17 at 01:14pm, Dave Young wrote: > Seems efi list was dropped, it if is intended not to cc public list > please let me know. > > On 05/26/17 at 03:04pm, Maniaxx wrote: > > On 26.05.2017 at 03:23 wrote Dave Young: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On 05/26/17 at 12:49am, Maniaxx wrote: > > >> PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) > > >> [regression] > > >> > > >> Commit: > > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7b0a911478c74ca02581d496f732c10e811e894f > > >> > > >> Kernel 4.10 and below are ok. 4.11 and 4.12rc2.r62.g2426125ab4eb freeze. > > >> Reverting the commit on 4.11 fixes the problem. Hardware report and > > >> earlyprintk output on the bugtracker. > > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195633 > > >> > > >> earlyprintk (text version): > > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713322#p1713322 > > >> > > >> Discussions on Arch Linux Forum: > > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1713344 > > >> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=226490 > > >> > > > Can you try below patch see if it works for you? > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/15/940 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Dave > > > > > Hello, > > doesn't work. Probably because the condition isn't met (i do have an EFI > > system). At least 4 people reported the problem and if i see it right > > all of them have Asus/Asrock boards. The BGRT init (at least on my side) > > always crashed with an Oops (on 4.10 and below) but never panic'd/froze. > > Can you double check it works before the commit of below? If machine > boots fine then check /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/image see if it exists or > not. One possible reason is bgrt init code bail out for some reason but > not in new code. > > If old code boots fine but without correct /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/* > then probably you can debug why it is not created then we can get some > clue about this report. Also it would be better to print the bgrt table like below (copied from Sabrina Dubroca's test code in another mail thread): pr_info("%s acpi_table_bgrt.version %hu\n", __func__, bgrt->version); pr_info("%s acpi_table_bgrt.status %hhu\n", __func__, bgrt->status); pr_info("%s acpi_table_bgrt.image_type %hhu\n", __func__, bgrt->image_type); pr_info("%s acpi_table_bgrt.image_address %llx\n", __func__, bgrt->image_address); print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "efi_bgrt_init acpi_table_bgrt", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, bgrt, sizeof(*bgrt), false); > > BTW if you can manange to save full kernel log it would be also helpful. > > commit 7b0a911478c74ca02581d496f732c10e811e894f > Author: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date: Tue Jan 31 13:21:40 2017 +0000 > > efi/x86: Move the EFI BGRT init code to early init code > > > > > -Maniaxx > > > > Thanks > Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20170527053457.GB3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] [not found] ` <20170527053457.GB3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-06-01 1:17 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-01 1:57 ` Dave Young 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Maniaxx @ 2017-06-01 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Cc: public-linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg On 27.05.2017 at 07:34 wrote Dave Young: >> Can you double check it works before the commit of below? linux-git-4.10rc5.r115.gc4c39c70c5fe is fine (1 commit back) linux-git-4.10rc5.r116.g7b0a911478c7 is not (early init BGRT patch) >> If machine >> boots fine then check /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/image see if it exists or >> not. Not sure. /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/ doesn't exist here but i have /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/ that contains all tables. BGRT is 60 bytes and holds the same binary content as pr_info hex_dump (in dmesg log below). >> if you can manange to save full kernel log it would be also helpful. Here is a log of linux-git-4.10rc5.r115.gc4c39c70c5fe with Sabrina Dubroca's test code applied: https://pastebin.com/ZkBNejrC This is how i applied the patch. I hope its correct: https://pastebin.com/see6V0Bk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-01 1:17 ` Maniaxx @ 2017-06-01 1:57 ` Dave Young [not found] ` <20170601015621.GA4306-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-06-01 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi, rjw, lenb, linux-acpi Cc ACPI people for thoughts.. On 06/01/17 at 03:17am, Maniaxx wrote: > On 27.05.2017 at 07:34 wrote Dave Young: > >> Can you double check it works before the commit of below? > linux-git-4.10rc5.r115.gc4c39c70c5fe is fine (1 commit back) > linux-git-4.10rc5.r116.g7b0a911478c7 is not (early init BGRT patch) > > >> If machine > >> boots fine then check /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/image see if it exists or > >> not. > Not sure. /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/ doesn't exist here but i have > /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/ that contains all tables. BGRT is 60 bytes > and holds the same binary content as pr_info hex_dump (in dmesg log below). This means the efi_bgrt_init failed out originally before the early init BGRT patch. Checking the code the only difference is current code we have no below code: status = acpi_get_table("BGRT", 0, (struct acpi_table_header **)&bgrt_tab); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) return; So probably acpi_get_table has some more sanity checking and it failed early. Can you add a printk before above return to confirm it? Just test the old kernel without early init BGRT patch. > > >> if you can manange to save full kernel log it would be also helpful. > Here is a log of linux-git-4.10rc5.r115.gc4c39c70c5fe with Sabrina > Dubroca's test code applied: > https://pastebin.com/ZkBNejrC > > This is how i applied the patch. I hope its correct: > https://pastebin.com/see6V0Bk > Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20170601015621.GA4306-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] [not found] ` <20170601015621.GA4306-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-06-01 19:13 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-02 2:51 ` Dave Young 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Maniaxx @ 2017-06-01 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 01.06.2017 at 03:57 wrote Dave Young: > This means the efi_bgrt_init failed out originally before the early init BGRT > patch. Checking the code the only difference is current code we have no > below code: > > status = acpi_get_table("BGRT", 0, > (struct acpi_table_header **)&bgrt_tab); > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > return; > > So probably acpi_get_table has some more sanity checking and it failed > early. Can you add a printk before above return to confirm it? Just test > the old kernel without early init BGRT patch. Doesn't fail early. I can see the printk. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-01 19:13 ` Maniaxx @ 2017-06-02 2:51 ` Dave Young 2017-06-03 18:24 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-07 8:57 ` Dave Young 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-06-02 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-acpi On 06/01/17 at 09:13pm, Maniaxx wrote: > On 01.06.2017 at 03:57 wrote Dave Young: > > This means the efi_bgrt_init failed out originally before the early init BGRT > > patch. Checking the code the only difference is current code we have no > > below code: > > > > status = acpi_get_table("BGRT", 0, > > (struct acpi_table_header **)&bgrt_tab); > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > > return; > > > > So probably acpi_get_table has some more sanity checking and it failed > > early. Can you add a printk before above return to confirm it? Just test > > the old kernel without early init BGRT patch. > > Doesn't fail early. I can see the printk. Since you do not see /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt, that means there must be somewhere failed early so bgrt image sysfs files are not created. for old kernel arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c copy the bgrt image then drivers/acpi/bgrt.c will populate the image in sysfs. Can you do more debugging ie. adding more printk see why bgrt image sysfs dir is not created? If we get the reason then we can start to see what we missed in new code. Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-02 2:51 ` Dave Young @ 2017-06-03 18:24 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-04 0:11 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-07 8:57 ` Dave Young 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Maniaxx @ 2017-06-03 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-acpi; +Cc: linux-efi Isn't the image address invalid if bgrt_tab->status is 0 (regarding ACPI specs below)? The image address could be total garbage and probably the reason why memremap (in efi-bgrt.c) leads to different behavior on early_init. If so, you might need to add another condition to check status and bail out before memremap. ************************************************************************************** Source: http://www.acpi.info/DOWNLOADS/ACPIspec50.pdf 5.2.22 Boot Graphics Resource Table (BGRT) [...] If the boot path is interrupted (e.g. by a key press), the valid bit within the status field should be changed to 0 to indicate to the OS that the current image is invalidated. 5.2.22.2 Status The status field contains information about the current status of the table. The Valid bit is bit 0 of the lowest byte. It should be set to 1 when the table is written, and invalidated if there is reason to expect that the screen state has been changed. 5.2.22.4 Image Address The Image Address contains the location in memory where an in-memory copy of the boot image can be found. The image should be stored in EfiBootServicesData, allowing the system to reclaim the memory when the image is no longer needed. ************************************************************************************** Decompiled BGRT table: $ sudo acpidump > acpi.dat $ acpixtract -a acpi.dat $ iasl -d bgrt.dat $ cat bgrt.dsl /* * Intel ACPI Component Architecture * AML/ASL+ Disassembler version 20170303 (64-bit version) * Copyright (c) 2000 - 2017 Intel Corporation * * Disassembly of bgrt.dat, Sat Jun 3 15:33:10 2017 * * ACPI Data Table [BGRT] * * Format: [HexOffset DecimalOffset ByteLength] FieldName : FieldValue */ [000h 0000 4] Signature : "BGRT" [Boot Graphics Resource Table] [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 0000003C [008h 0008 1] Revision : 00 [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 89 [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "ALASKA" [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "A M I" [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 01072009 [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "AMI " [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00010013 [024h 0036 2] Version : 0001 [026h 0038 1] Status : 00 [027h 0039 1] Image Type : 00 [028h 0040 8] Image Address : 0A08E01800000001 [030h 0048 4] Image OffsetX : 00000000 [034h 0052 4] Image OffsetY : 00000000 Raw Table Data: Length 60 (0x3C) 0000: 42 47 52 54 3C 00 00 00 00 89 41 4C 41 53 4B 41 // BGRT<.....ALASKA 0010: 41 20 4D 20 49 00 00 00 09 20 07 01 41 4D 49 20 // A M I.... ..AMI 0020: 13 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 18 E0 08 0A // ................ 0030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 // ............ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-03 18:24 ` Maniaxx @ 2017-06-04 0:11 ` Maniaxx 2017-06-04 2:45 ` Maniaxx 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Maniaxx @ 2017-06-04 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-acpi; +Cc: linux-efi New kernel (with early_init panic): In contrast to old kernel early_memremap is successful and "Ignoring BGRT: failed to map image header memory" condition isn't triggered. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.11-rc1/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c#L65 The next memcpy is the culprit for the panic. I've checked that with printk. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.11-rc1/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c#L71 This leads to this commit: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/66dbe99cfe30e113d2e571e68b9b6a1a8985a157 My u64 image address might be complete garbage (0A08E01800000001). Rather looks like 2x u32. Here is another BGRT image address that looks much more valid than mine (on boundary, lower mem area). https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2264380 If so, we are poking in invalid memory areas. Reverting the commit until a better way is found to identify a valid image address should fix the problem. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-04 0:11 ` Maniaxx @ 2017-06-04 2:45 ` Maniaxx 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Maniaxx @ 2017-06-04 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-acpi; +Cc: linux-efi I've reverted 66dbe99cfe30e113d2e571e68b9b6a1a8985a157 from linux-git-4.11.r1.gaf8b4c0323e1 and it boots properly now indeed. I've asked for some more BGRT dumps to get more image addresses: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1715699#p1715699 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] 2017-06-02 2:51 ` Dave Young 2017-06-03 18:24 ` Maniaxx @ 2017-06-07 8:57 ` Dave Young 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2017-06-07 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maniaxx; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-acpi On 06/02/17 at 10:51am, Dave Young wrote: > On 06/01/17 at 09:13pm, Maniaxx wrote: > > On 01.06.2017 at 03:57 wrote Dave Young: > > > This means the efi_bgrt_init failed out originally before the early init BGRT > > > patch. Checking the code the only difference is current code we have no > > > below code: > > > > > > status = acpi_get_table("BGRT", 0, > > > (struct acpi_table_header **)&bgrt_tab); > > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > > > return; > > > > > > So probably acpi_get_table has some more sanity checking and it failed > > > early. Can you add a printk before above return to confirm it? Just test > > > the old kernel without early init BGRT patch. > > > > Doesn't fail early. I can see the printk. > > Since you do not see /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt, that means there must be > somewhere failed early so bgrt image sysfs files are not created. > for old kernel arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c copy the bgrt image > then drivers/acpi/bgrt.c will populate the image in sysfs. > > Can you do more debugging ie. adding more printk see why bgrt image > sysfs dir is not created? > > If we get the reason then we can start to see what we missed in new > code. Please ignore the request, I observed in your old kernel boot log there is a ioremap error message about invalid physical address, so that is clear since ioremap failed then efi_bgrt_init bails out. In new code we use early_memremap, it seems lacks of checking invalid physical address, The firmware provides garbage in efi bgrt image addresses, I will work on a fix for this. Thanks Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-07 8:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <86c36f9b-f633-3354-d676-7693f35dae0d@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <86c36f9b-f633-3354-d676-7693f35dae0d-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-26 1:23 ` PROBLEM: Kernel panic on EFI BGRT early init code (kernel 4.11/4.12rc2) [regression] Dave Young
[not found] ` <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <a32eea98-9576-1ee7-c27a-b165204d825f-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-27 5:14 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <20170527051427.GA3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-27 5:34 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <20170527053457.GB3492-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-01 1:17 ` Maniaxx
2017-06-01 1:57 ` Dave Young
[not found] ` <20170601015621.GA4306-0VdLhd/A9Pl+NNSt+8eSiB/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-01 19:13 ` Maniaxx
2017-06-02 2:51 ` Dave Young
2017-06-03 18:24 ` Maniaxx
2017-06-04 0:11 ` Maniaxx
2017-06-04 2:45 ` Maniaxx
2017-06-07 8:57 ` Dave Young
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox