From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:42:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219956155.6384.3.camel@mingming-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219850916-8986-3-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
在 2008-08-27三的 20:58 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道:
> During block reservation if we don't have enough
> blocks left, retry block reservation with smaller
> block count. This make sure we try fallocate
> and DIO with smaller request size and don't fail early.
> The delayed allocation reservation cannot try with smaller
> block count. So retry block reservation to handle temporary
> disk full conditions. Also print free blocks details if we
> fail block allocation during writepages.
>
Added to patch queue.
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/balloc.c | 8 +++++++-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index dc10bfd..5767332 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -1738,10 +1738,16 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_old_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> /*
> * With delalloc we already reserved the blocks
> */
> - if (ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, *count)) {
> + while (*count && ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, *count)) {
> + /* let others to free the space */
> + yield();
> + *count = *count >> 1;
> + }
> + if (!*count) {
> *errp = -ENOSPC;
> return 0; /*return with ENOSPC error */
> }
> + num = *count;
> }
> /*
> * Check quota for allocation of this block.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index d965a05..98a998b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
>
> static int ext4_da_reserve_space(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks)
> {
> + int retries = 0;
> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> unsigned long md_needed, mdblocks, total = 0;
>
> @@ -1529,6 +1530,7 @@ static int ext4_da_reserve_space(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks)
> * in order to allocate nrblocks
> * worse case is one extent per block
> */
> +repeat:
> spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> total = EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks + nrblocks;
> mdblocks = ext4_calc_metadata_amount(inode, total);
> @@ -1539,6 +1541,10 @@ static int ext4_da_reserve_space(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks)
>
> if (ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, total)) {
> spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> + if (ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) {
> + yield();
> + goto repeat;
> + }
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks += nrblocks;
> @@ -1825,20 +1831,18 @@ static void ext4_da_block_invalidatepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd,
> static int mpage_da_map_blocks(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
> {
> int err = 0;
> + struct buffer_head new;
> struct buffer_head *lbh = &mpd->lbh;
> sector_t next = lbh->b_blocknr;
> - struct buffer_head new;
>
> /*
> * We consider only non-mapped and non-allocated blocks
> */
> if (buffer_mapped(lbh) && !buffer_delay(lbh))
> return 0;
> -
> new.b_state = lbh->b_state;
> new.b_blocknr = 0;
> new.b_size = lbh->b_size;
> -
> /*
> * If we didn't accumulate anything
> * to write simply return
> @@ -1871,6 +1875,10 @@ static int mpage_da_map_blocks(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
> lbh->b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits, err);
> printk(KERN_EMERG "This should not happen.!! "
> "Data will be lost\n");
> + if (err == -ENOSPC) {
> + printk(KERN_CRIT "Total free blocks count %lld\n",
> + ext4_count_free_blocks(mpd->inode->i_sb));
> + }
> /* invlaidate all the pages */
> ext4_da_block_invalidatepages(mpd, next,
> lbh->b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 4404b46..419009f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -4397,7 +4397,12 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle,
> /*
> * With delalloc we already reserved the blocks
> */
> - if (ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, ar->len)) {
> + while (ar->len && ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, ar->len)) {
> + /* let others to free the space */
> + yield();
> + ar->len = ar->len >> 1;
> + }
> + if (!ar->len) {
> *errp = -ENOSPC;
> return 0;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-28 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-27 15:28 [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 10/11] ext4: Add inode to journal handle after block allocation for ordered mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 11/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:57 ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 3:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-29 4:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-29 5:02 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 5:06 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 8:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:04 ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03 ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03 ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:57 ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Mingming Cao
2008-10-09 20:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-10 4:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10 4:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-11 21:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-08-28 20:42 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2008-08-28 20:41 ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Mingming Cao
2008-08-27 19:05 ` [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Andrew Morton
2008-08-27 21:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-27 21:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 3:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 4:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 22:59 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-28 3:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 14:19 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219956155.6384.3.camel@mingming-laptop \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox