public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:14:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829034451.GA6444@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219960669.6384.58.camel@mingming-laptop>

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:57:49PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> 
> From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
> 
> ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
>     
> We run into ENOSPC error on nonmballoc ext4, even when there is free blocks
> on the filesystem.
> 
> The problem is triggered in the case the goal block group has 0 free blocks
> , and the rest block groups are skipped due to the check of "free_blocks 
> < windowsz/2".

The goal block group had free blocks < windowsz .


>Current code could fall back to non reservation allocation
> to prevent early ENOSPC after examing all the block groups with reservation on
> , but this code was  bypassed if the reservation window is turned off already,
> which is true in this case.
> 
> This patch fixed two issues:
> 1) We don't need to turn off block reservation if the goal block group has 
> 0 free blocks left and continue search for the rest of block groups.
> 
> Current code the intention is to turn off the block reservation if the
>  goal allocation group has a few (some) free blocks left (not enough 
> for make the desired reservation window),to try to allocation in the
>  goal block group, to get better locality. But if the goal blocks have 
> 0 free blocks,  it should leave the block reservation on, and continues
> search for the next block groups,rather than turn off block reservation
> completely.

I don't see how this change is going to make a difference. The goal group
had free blocks < windowsz and that made my_rsv = NULL. I guess we
should not make my_rsv in the first loop. Or in otherwords we can remove

/*
 * if there is not enough free blocks to make a new
 * resevation
 * turn off reservation for this allocation
 */
if (my_rsv && (free_blocks < windowsz)
		&& (free_blocks > 0)
		&& (rsv_is_empty(&my_rsv->rsv_window)))
	my_rsv = NULL;

And since we have the below check in the for loop

if (my_rsv && (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2)))
	continue;

We would skip all the groups that have low free block count.
Now if we are not able to allocate any blocks (ENOSPC)
we loop back because of 

if (my_rsv) {
	my_rsv = NULL;
	windowsz = 0;
	group_no = goal_group;
	goto retry_alloc;
}

and that would allocate blocks from the first group available.
This also give a chance to scan all the groups to make sure
if we have any of them left with enough free blocks to 
add to the reservation.


> 
> 2) we don't need to check the window size if the block reservation is off. 


This change i have already tested.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>


Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


> 
> Index: linux-2.6.27-rc3/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc3.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2008-08-28 12:41:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2008-08-28 14:40:43.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1807,6 +1807,7 @@
>  	 * turn off reservation for this allocation
>  	 */
>  	if (my_rsv && (free_blocks < windowsz)
> +		&& (free_blocks > 0)
>  		&& (rsv_is_empty(&my_rsv->rsv_window)))
>  		my_rsv = NULL;
> 
> @@ -1843,7 +1844,7 @@
>  		 * free blocks is less than half of the reservation
>  		 * window size.
>  		 */
> -		if (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2))
> +		if (my_rsv && (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2)))
>  			continue;
> 
>  		brelse(bitmap_bh);
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-29  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-27 15:28 [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28   ` [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28     ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28       ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28         ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28           ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28             ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28               ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28                 ` [PATCH -V3 10/11] ext4: Add inode to journal handle after block allocation for ordered mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28                   ` [PATCH -V3 11/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:57                 ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Mingming Cao
2008-08-29  3:44                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-08-29  4:14                     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-29  5:02                       ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29  5:06                     ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29  8:25                       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:04               ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03             ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03           ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:57         ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:56       ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Mingming Cao
2008-10-09 20:44       ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-10  4:52         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10  4:58           ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-11 21:10         ` Andreas Dilger
2008-08-28 20:42     ` [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:41   ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Mingming Cao
2008-08-27 19:05 ` [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Andrew Morton
2008-08-27 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-27 21:22     ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28  3:52       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28  4:09         ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 22:59           ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-28  7:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-28  3:48   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28  4:06     ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 14:19       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080829034451.GA6444@skywalker \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox