From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:14:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829034451.GA6444@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219960669.6384.58.camel@mingming-laptop>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:57:49PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
>
> From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
>
> ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC
>
> We run into ENOSPC error on nonmballoc ext4, even when there is free blocks
> on the filesystem.
>
> The problem is triggered in the case the goal block group has 0 free blocks
> , and the rest block groups are skipped due to the check of "free_blocks
> < windowsz/2".
The goal block group had free blocks < windowsz .
>Current code could fall back to non reservation allocation
> to prevent early ENOSPC after examing all the block groups with reservation on
> , but this code was bypassed if the reservation window is turned off already,
> which is true in this case.
>
> This patch fixed two issues:
> 1) We don't need to turn off block reservation if the goal block group has
> 0 free blocks left and continue search for the rest of block groups.
>
> Current code the intention is to turn off the block reservation if the
> goal allocation group has a few (some) free blocks left (not enough
> for make the desired reservation window),to try to allocation in the
> goal block group, to get better locality. But if the goal blocks have
> 0 free blocks, it should leave the block reservation on, and continues
> search for the next block groups,rather than turn off block reservation
> completely.
I don't see how this change is going to make a difference. The goal group
had free blocks < windowsz and that made my_rsv = NULL. I guess we
should not make my_rsv in the first loop. Or in otherwords we can remove
/*
* if there is not enough free blocks to make a new
* resevation
* turn off reservation for this allocation
*/
if (my_rsv && (free_blocks < windowsz)
&& (free_blocks > 0)
&& (rsv_is_empty(&my_rsv->rsv_window)))
my_rsv = NULL;
And since we have the below check in the for loop
if (my_rsv && (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2)))
continue;
We would skip all the groups that have low free block count.
Now if we are not able to allocate any blocks (ENOSPC)
we loop back because of
if (my_rsv) {
my_rsv = NULL;
windowsz = 0;
group_no = goal_group;
goto retry_alloc;
}
and that would allocate blocks from the first group available.
This also give a chance to scan all the groups to make sure
if we have any of them left with enough free blocks to
add to the reservation.
>
> 2) we don't need to check the window size if the block reservation is off.
This change i have already tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.27-rc3/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc3.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c 2008-08-28 12:41:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3/fs/ext4/balloc.c 2008-08-28 14:40:43.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1807,6 +1807,7 @@
> * turn off reservation for this allocation
> */
> if (my_rsv && (free_blocks < windowsz)
> + && (free_blocks > 0)
> && (rsv_is_empty(&my_rsv->rsv_window)))
> my_rsv = NULL;
>
> @@ -1843,7 +1844,7 @@
> * free blocks is less than half of the reservation
> * window size.
> */
> - if (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2))
> + if (my_rsv && (free_blocks <= (windowsz/2)))
> continue;
>
> brelse(bitmap_bh);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-27 15:28 [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 10/11] ext4: Add inode to journal handle after block allocation for ordered mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-27 15:28 ` [PATCH -V3 11/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:57 ` [PATCH -V3 09/11] ext4: Fix ext4 nomballoc allocator for ENOSPC Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 3:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-08-29 4:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-29 5:02 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 5:06 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-29 8:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 21:04 ` [PATCH -V3 08/11] ext4: Signed arithematic fix Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03 ` [PATCH -V3 07/11] ext4: request for blocks with ar.excepted_group = -1 Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 21:03 ` [PATCH -V3 06/11] ext4: Update meta-data reservation with delalloc Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:57 ` [PATCH -V3 05/11] ext4: Switch to non delalloc mode when we are low on free blocks count Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH -V3 04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Mingming Cao
2008-10-09 20:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-10 4:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-10 4:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-11 21:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-08-28 20:42 ` [PATCH -V3 03/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 20:41 ` [PATCH -V3 02/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Mingming Cao
2008-08-27 19:05 ` [PATCH -V3 01/11] percpu_counters: make fbc->count read atomic on 32 bit architecture Andrew Morton
2008-08-27 21:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-27 21:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 3:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 4:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 22:59 ` Mingming Cao
2008-08-28 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-28 3:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-28 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 14:19 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080829034451.GA6444@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox