From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: duaneg@dghda.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: + ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:37:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806050437.m554bqsc025546@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
ext2: don't inherit inappropriate inode flags from parent
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ext2: don't inherit inappropriate inode flags from parent
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@dghda.com>
Fix the TOPDIR flag inheritance bug reported at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866.
Some file attributes have sticky behaviour in ext2/3 whereas I believe
it should not. Namely, a directory marked with chattr +T serves "to be
the top of directory hierarchies for the purposes of the Orlov block
allocator", as the manpage says.
It seems wrong that subdirectories stickily inherit the +T flag: they
are obviously not top-level! Even files get the T attribute this way,
even though the chattr manpages only documents it for directories.
Also prevent inheritance of other flags that Andreas Dilger identified as
inappropriate to inherit
At present BTREE is the only flag that new ext2 inodes do NOT inherit from
their parent. In addition prevent the flags DIRTY, ECOMPR, INDEX, IMAGIC
and TOPDIR from being inherited.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ext2/ialloc.c | 2 +-
include/linux/ext2_fs.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/ext2/ialloc.c~ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent fs/ext2/ialloc.c
--- a/fs/ext2/ialloc.c~ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent
+++ a/fs/ext2/ialloc.c
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ got:
inode->i_blocks = 0;
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
memset(ei->i_data, 0, sizeof(ei->i_data));
- ei->i_flags = EXT2_I(dir)->i_flags & ~EXT2_BTREE_FL;
+ ei->i_flags = EXT2_I(dir)->i_flags & EXT2_FL_INHERITED;
if (S_ISLNK(mode))
ei->i_flags &= ~(EXT2_IMMUTABLE_FL|EXT2_APPEND_FL);
/* dirsync is only applied to directories */
diff -puN include/linux/ext2_fs.h~ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent include/linux/ext2_fs.h
--- a/include/linux/ext2_fs.h~ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent
+++ a/include/linux/ext2_fs.h
@@ -194,6 +194,10 @@ struct ext2_group_desc
#define EXT2_FL_USER_VISIBLE FS_FL_USER_VISIBLE /* User visible flags */
#define EXT2_FL_USER_MODIFIABLE FS_FL_USER_MODIFIABLE /* User modifiable flags */
+/* Flags that should be inherited by new inodes from their parent. */
+#define EXT2_FL_INHERITED ~(EXT2_DIRTY_FL | EXT2_ECOMPR_FL | EXT2_BTREE_FL |\
+ EXT2_INDEX_FL | EXT2_IMAGIC_FL | EXT2_TOPDIR_FL)
+
/*
* ioctl commands
*/
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from duaneg@dghda.com are
jbd-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
jbd-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
ext3-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-05 4:37 akpm [this message]
2008-06-05 5:30 ` + ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch added to -mm tree Andreas Dilger
2008-06-05 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-07 6:18 akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806050437.m554bqsc025546@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=duaneg@dghda.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox