public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:46:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160814194629.GA28207@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57B0C81F.9000309@oracle.com>

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:35:59PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 08/14/2016 09:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > > The commit which is being fixed is ancient:
> > > 
> > > $ git describe 8556e8f3b6
> > > v2.6.28-5758-g8556e8f3
> > > 
> > > It's probably already in the base of every current stable tree, no?
> > 
> > Huh?  Ok, this odd:
> > 	$ git describe --contains 8556e8f3b6
> > 	fatal: cannot describe '8556e8f3b6c4c11601ce1e9ea8090a6d8bd5daae'
> > 
> > Yet just a plain 'git describe' does work...
> > 
> > That's what threw me off, I only use --contains as that shows the
> > release the commit is in.
> > 
> > Ok, that makes me feel a bit better (that my scripts didn't miss the
> > patch, it was just old), but I wonder what is going on with git...
> > 
> 
> How odd.
> 
> There is this:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg246837.html
> 
> """
> Yes, the "describe --contains" algorithm uses timestamps to cut off the
> traversal, so it can do the wrong thing if there's clock skew. It has a
> "slop" margin of one day, but skew larger than that can fool it.
> """
> 
> It looks like ancestors of 87d8fe1 don't work:
> 
> $ for commit in $(git rev-list 87d8fe1^^..87d8fe1); do git describe
> --contains $commit; done
> v2.6.29-rc1~40^2~12
> fatal: cannot describe '0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c'
> 
> So maybe it's because the parent commit is 2 days in the future:
> 
> $ git log --format=fuller 87d8fe1^^..87d8fe1
> commit 87d8fe1ee6b8d2f95076142d58c440dba4e7bdc2
> Author:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> AuthorDate: Sat Jan 3 09:47:09 2009 -0500
> Commit:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> CommitDate: Sat Jan 3 09:47:09 2009 -0500
> [...]
> 
> commit 0087d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b058376d80e5adde4c
> Author:     Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon Jan 5 21:49:12 2009 -0500
> Commit:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> CommitDate: Mon Jan 5 21:49:12 2009 -0500
> [...]

Ouch, that's some clock skew.

Thanks for working this out, I've now applied the patch to the stable
trees.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-14 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160727052921.5B41C35574@git2.kroah.org>
2016-08-14 18:32 ` ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error Greg KH
2016-08-14 18:37   ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-14 18:51     ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 18:58       ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 19:02         ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-14 19:09           ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 19:35             ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-14 19:46               ` Greg KH [this message]
2016-08-14 20:19             ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160814194629.GA28207@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox