From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:02:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B0C058.9010800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160814185805.GA8087@kroah.com>
On 08/14/2016 08:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:51:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:37:56PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>>> On 08/14/2016 08:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> Hi Vegard and ext4 developers,
>>>>
>>>> The patch below, in Linus's tree, references a patch in the Fixes: line
>>>> that is not in Linus's tree (neither the git commit id, nor the subject
>>>> line.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seems to exist?
>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block
>>> allocation")
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8556e8f3b6c4c11601ce1e9ea8090a6d8bd5daae
>>>
>>>> That's a bit confusing, what is this patch supposed to be fixing up?
>>>> What stable tree(s) should it go to if the original patch it fixes isn't
>>>> even in any tree?
>>>
>>> The referenced commit adds the ext4_mb_release_context(ac); line which
>>> is what is causing problems because that releases the context which is
>>> still in fact in use.
>>
>> Oh doh, sorry for the noise, I was only looking at 4.8-rc1 and older, my
>> fault.
>
> Hm, wait. Commit 8556e8f3b6 didn't show up in my filters for some
> reason (which it not good, and makes me worry), but also, it doesn't
> apply to the stable trees at all.
>
> So can you please send backports of that commit, and this one, if you
> want them both queued up to any stable kernel tree?
The commit which is being fixed is ancient:
$ git describe 8556e8f3b6
v2.6.28-5758-g8556e8f3
It's probably already in the base of every current stable tree, no?
Vegard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-14 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160727052921.5B41C35574@git2.kroah.org>
2016-08-14 18:32 ` ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error Greg KH
2016-08-14 18:37 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-14 18:51 ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 18:58 ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 19:02 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2016-08-14 19:09 ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 19:35 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-08-14 19:46 ` Greg KH
2016-08-14 20:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57B0C058.9010800@oracle.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox