From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<yukuai3@huawei.com>, <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>,
xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 23:05:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231221150558.2740823-2-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231221150558.2740823-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
In ext4_move_extents(), moved_len is only updated when all moves are
successfully executed, and only discards orig_inode and donor_inode
preallocations when moved_len is not zero. When the loop fails to exit
after successfully moving some extents, moved_len is not updated and
remains at 0, so it does not discard the preallocations.
If the moved extents overlap with the preallocated extents, the
overlapped extents are freed twice in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa() and
ext4_process_freed_data() (as described in commit 94d7c16cbbbd ("ext4:
Fix double-free of blocks with EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT")), and bb_free is
incremented twice. Hence when trim is executed, a zero-division bug is
triggered in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() because bb_free is not zero
and bb_fragments is zero.
Therefore, update move_len after each extent move to avoid the issue.
Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
Reported-by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAO4mrferzqBUnCag8R3m2zf897ts9UEuhjFQGPtODT92rYyR2Q@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: fcf6b1b729bc ("ext4: refactor ext4_move_extents code base")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
index 3aa57376d9c2..391efa6d4c56 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
@@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
goto out;
o_end = o_start + len;
+ *moved_len = 0;
while (o_start < o_end) {
struct ext4_extent *ex;
ext4_lblk_t cur_blk, next_blk;
@@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
*/
ext4_double_up_write_data_sem(orig_inode, donor_inode);
/* Swap original branches with new branches */
- move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
+ *moved_len += move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
orig_page_index, donor_page_index,
offset_in_page, cur_len,
unwritten, &ret);
@@ -682,9 +683,6 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
o_start += cur_len;
d_start += cur_len;
}
- *moved_len = o_start - orig_blk;
- if (*moved_len > len)
- *moved_len = len;
out:
if (*moved_len) {
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 15:05 [PATCH v2 0/8] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2024-01-04 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ext4: do not trim the group with corrupted block bitmap Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ext4: regenerate buddy after block freeing failed if under fc replay Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 11:31 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 11:43 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ext4: avoid dividing by 0 in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() when block bitmap corrupt Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:43 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_try_best_found() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:45 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_find_by_goal() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:47 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: mark the group block bitmap as corrupted before reporting an error Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:51 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 12:14 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231221150558.2740823-2-libaokun1@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox