From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>,
xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:27:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104102700.kqfc6xg3mc7ur5kl@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231221150558.2740823-2-libaokun1@huawei.com>
On Thu 21-12-23 23:05:51, Baokun Li wrote:
> In ext4_move_extents(), moved_len is only updated when all moves are
> successfully executed, and only discards orig_inode and donor_inode
> preallocations when moved_len is not zero. When the loop fails to exit
> after successfully moving some extents, moved_len is not updated and
> remains at 0, so it does not discard the preallocations.
>
> If the moved extents overlap with the preallocated extents, the
> overlapped extents are freed twice in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa() and
> ext4_process_freed_data() (as described in commit 94d7c16cbbbd ("ext4:
> Fix double-free of blocks with EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT")), and bb_free is
> incremented twice. Hence when trim is executed, a zero-division bug is
> triggered in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() because bb_free is not zero
> and bb_fragments is zero.
>
> Therefore, update move_len after each extent move to avoid the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAO4mrferzqBUnCag8R3m2zf897ts9UEuhjFQGPtODT92rYyR2Q@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: fcf6b1b729bc ("ext4: refactor ext4_move_extents code base")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Looks good! Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> index 3aa57376d9c2..391efa6d4c56 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> @@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> goto out;
> o_end = o_start + len;
>
> + *moved_len = 0;
> while (o_start < o_end) {
> struct ext4_extent *ex;
> ext4_lblk_t cur_blk, next_blk;
> @@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> */
> ext4_double_up_write_data_sem(orig_inode, donor_inode);
> /* Swap original branches with new branches */
> - move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> + *moved_len += move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> orig_page_index, donor_page_index,
> offset_in_page, cur_len,
> unwritten, &ret);
> @@ -682,9 +683,6 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> o_start += cur_len;
> d_start += cur_len;
> }
> - *moved_len = o_start - orig_blk;
> - if (*moved_len > len)
> - *moved_len = len;
>
> out:
> if (*moved_len) {
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 15:05 [PATCH v2 0/8] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:27 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ext4: do not trim the group with corrupted block bitmap Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ext4: regenerate buddy after block freeing failed if under fc replay Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 11:31 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 11:43 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ext4: avoid dividing by 0 in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() when block bitmap corrupt Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:43 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_try_best_found() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:45 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ext4: avoid allocating blocks from corrupted group in ext4_mb_find_by_goal() Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:47 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-21 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: mark the group block bitmap as corrupted before reporting an error Baokun Li
2024-01-04 10:51 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-04 12:14 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104102700.kqfc6xg3mc7ur5kl@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox