public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <jack@suse.cz>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/16] ext4: factor out __ext4_mb_scan_group()
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:32:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250623073304.3275702-12-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623073304.3275702-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>

Extract __ext4_mb_scan_group() to make the code clearer and to
prepare for the later conversion of 'choose group' to 'scan groups'.
No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 fs/ext4/mballoc.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index dc82124f0905..db5d8b1e5cce 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2569,6 +2569,30 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	}
 }
 
+static void __ext4_mb_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
+{
+	bool is_stripe_aligned;
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
+	enum criteria cr = ac->ac_criteria;
+
+	ac->ac_groups_scanned++;
+	if (cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED)
+		return ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, ac->ac_e4b);
+
+	sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
+	is_stripe_aligned = false;
+	if ((sbi->s_stripe >= sbi->s_cluster_ratio) &&
+	    !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe)))
+		is_stripe_aligned = true;
+
+	if ((cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST || cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) &&
+	    is_stripe_aligned)
+		ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, ac->ac_e4b);
+
+	if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_CONTINUE)
+		ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, ac->ac_e4b);
+}
+
 /*
  * This is also called BEFORE we load the buddy bitmap.
  * Returns either 1 or 0 indicating that the group is either suitable
@@ -2855,6 +2879,8 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 	 */
 	if (ac->ac_2order)
 		cr = CR_POWER2_ALIGNED;
+
+	ac->ac_e4b = &e4b;
 repeat:
 	for (; cr < EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS && ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_CONTINUE; cr++) {
 		ac->ac_criteria = cr;
@@ -2932,24 +2958,7 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			ac->ac_groups_scanned++;
-			if (cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED)
-				ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
-			else {
-				bool is_stripe_aligned =
-					(sbi->s_stripe >=
-					 sbi->s_cluster_ratio) &&
-					!(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len %
-					  EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_stripe));
-
-				if ((cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST ||
-				     cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) &&
-				    is_stripe_aligned)
-					ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, &e4b);
-
-				if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_CONTINUE)
-					ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
-			}
+			__ext4_mb_scan_group(ac);
 
 			ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
 			ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
index 38c37901728d..d61d690d237c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
@@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context {
 	__u8 ac_2order;		/* if request is to allocate 2^N blocks and
 				 * N > 0, the field stores N, otherwise 0 */
 	__u8 ac_op;		/* operation, for history only */
+
+	struct ext4_buddy *ac_e4b;
 	struct folio *ac_bitmap_folio;
 	struct folio *ac_buddy_folio;
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *ac_pa;
-- 
2.46.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-23  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-23  7:32 [PATCH v2 00/16] ext4: better scalability for ext4 block allocation Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] ext4: add ext4_try_lock_group() to skip busy groups Baokun Li
2025-06-27 18:06   ` Jan Kara
2025-07-14  6:53   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] ext4: remove unnecessary s_mb_last_start Baokun Li
2025-06-27 18:15   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  3:32     ` Baokun Li
2025-06-30  7:31       ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  7:52         ` Baokun Li
2025-07-14  7:00           ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] ext4: remove unnecessary s_md_lock on update s_mb_last_group Baokun Li
2025-06-27 18:19   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  3:48     ` Baokun Li
2025-06-30  7:47       ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  9:21         ` Baokun Li
2025-06-30 16:32           ` Jan Kara
2025-07-01  2:39             ` Baokun Li
2025-07-01 12:21               ` Jan Kara
2025-07-01 13:17                 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-08 13:08                 ` Baokun Li
2025-07-10 14:38                   ` Jan Kara
2025-07-14  3:01                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-14  7:00                       ` Baokun Li
2025-07-01  2:57   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] ext4: utilize multiple global goals to reduce contention Baokun Li
2025-06-27 18:31   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  6:50     ` Baokun Li
2025-06-30  8:38       ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30 10:02         ` Baokun Li
2025-06-30 17:41           ` Jan Kara
2025-07-01  3:32             ` Baokun Li
2025-07-01 11:53               ` Jan Kara
2025-07-01 12:12                 ` Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] ext4: get rid of some obsolete EXT4_MB_HINT flags Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] ext4: fix typo in CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW comment Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] ext4: convert sbi->s_mb_free_pending to atomic_t Baokun Li
2025-06-27 18:33   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] ext4: merge freed extent with existing extents before insertion Baokun Li
2025-06-27 19:11   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] ext4: fix zombie groups in average fragment size lists Baokun Li
2025-06-27 19:14   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  6:53     ` Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] ext4: fix largest free orders lists corruption on mb_optimize_scan switch Baokun Li
2025-06-27 19:34   ` Jan Kara
2025-06-30  7:34     ` Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:32 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2025-06-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_might_prefetch() Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] ext4: factor out ext4_mb_scan_group() Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] ext4: convert free group lists to ordered xarrays Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] ext4: refactor choose group to scan group Baokun Li
2025-06-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] ext4: ensure global ordered traversal across all free groups xarrays Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250623073304.3275702-12-libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox