From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4/063: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:41:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729194154.GT2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6f7b73de6bb6ebfc78e533f89f0899d884e5490.1752329098.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:42:54PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> In ext4, even if an allocated range is physically and logically
> contiguous, it can still be split into 2 extents. This is because ext4
> does not merge extents across leaf nodes. This is an issue for atomic
> writes since even for a continuous extent the map block could (in rare
> cases) return a shorter map, hence tearning the write. This test creates
> such a file and ensures that the atomic write handles this case
> correctly
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/ext4/063 | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/063.out | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/063
> create mode 100644 tests/ext4/063.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/063 b/tests/ext4/063
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..25b5693d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/063
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# In ext4, even if an allocated range is physically and logically contiguous,
> +# it can still be split into 2 extents. This is because ext4 does not merge
> +# extents across leaf nodes. This is an issue for atomic writes since even for
> +# a continuous extent the map block could (in rare cases) return a shorter map,
> +# hence tearning the write. This test creates such a file and ensures that the
> +# atomic write handles this case correctly
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +_begin_fstest auto atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic_multi_fsblock
> +_require_atomic_write_test_commands
> +_require_command "$DEBUGFS_PROG" debugfs
> +
> +prep() {
> + local bs=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT`
> + local ex_hdr_bytes=12
> + local ex_entry_bytes=12
> + local entries_per_blk=$(( (bs - ex_hdr_bytes) / ex_entry_bytes ))
> +
> + # fill the extent tree leaf which bs len extents at alternate offsets. For example,
> + # for 4k bs the tree should look as follows
> + #
> + # +---------+---------+
> + # | index 1 | index 2 |
> + # +-----+---+-----+---+
> + # +--------+ +-------+
> + # | |
> + # +----------+--------------+ +-----+-----+
> + # | ex 1 | ex 2 |... | ex n | | ex n + 1 |
> + # +-------------------------+ +-----------+
> + # 0 2 680 682
> + for i in $(seq 0 $entries_per_blk)
> + do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite -b $bs $((i * 2 * bs)) $bs" $testfile > /dev/null
> + done
> + sync $testfile
> +
> + echo >> $seqres.full
> + echo "Create file with extents spanning 2 leaves. Extents:">> $seqres.full
> + echo "...">> $seqres.full
> + $DEBUGFS_PROG -R "ex `basename $testfile`" $SCRATCH_DEV |& tail >> $seqres.full
> +
> + # Now try to insert a new extent ex(new) between ex(n) and ex(n+1). Since
> + # this is a new FS the allocator would find continuous blocks such that
> + # ex(n) ex(new) ex(n+1) are physically(and logically) contiguous. However,
> + # since we dont merge extents across leaf we will end up with a tree as:
> + #
> + # +---------+---------+
> + # | index 1 | index 2 |
> + # +-----+---+-----+---+
> + # +--------+ +-------+
> + # | |
> + # +----------+--------------+ +-----+-----+
> + # | ex 1 | ex 2 |... | ex n | | ex merged |
> + # +-------------------------+ +-----------+
> + # 0 2 680 681 682 684
Where did 684 come from? It's not in the 'before' diagram. Did
"ex n + 1" previously map 682-684, and now it maps 681-684?
The rest looks ok though.
--D
> + #
> + echo >> $seqres.full
> + torn_ex_offset=$((((entries_per_blk * 2) - 1) * bs))
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite $torn_ex_offset $bs" $testfile >> /dev/null
> + sync $testfile
> +
> + echo >> $seqres.full
> + echo "Perform 1 block write at $torn_ex_offset to create torn extent. Extents:">> $seqres.full
> + echo "...">> $seqres.full
> + $DEBUGFS_PROG -R "ex `basename $testfile`" $SCRATCH_DEV |& tail >> $seqres.full
> +
> + _scratch_cycle_mount
> +}
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> +touch $testfile
> +awu_max=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max $testfile)
> +
> +echo >> $seqres.full
> +echo "# Prepping the file" >> $seqres.full
> +prep
> +
> +torn_aw_offset=$((torn_ex_offset - (torn_ex_offset % awu_max)))
> +
> +echo >> $seqres.full
> +echo "# Performing atomic IO on the torn extent range. Command: " >> $seqres.full
> +echo $XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -fsd $testfile" -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -DA -V1 -b $awu_max $torn_aw_offset $awu_max" >> $seqres.full
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "open -fsd $testfile" -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -DA -V1 -b $awu_max $torn_aw_offset $awu_max" >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo >> $seqres.full
> +echo "Extent state after atomic write:">> $seqres.full
> +echo "...">> $seqres.full
> +$DEBUGFS_PROG -R "ex `basename $testfile`" $SCRATCH_DEV |& tail >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo >> $seqres.full
> +echo "# Checking data integrity" >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# create a dummy file with expected data
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite -S 0x61 -b $awu_max 0 $awu_max" $testfile.exp >> /dev/null
> +expected_data=$(od -An -t x1 -j 0 -N $awu_max $testfile.exp)
> +
> +# We ensure that the data after atomic writes should match the expected data
> +actual_data=$(od -An -t x1 -j $torn_aw_offset -N $awu_max $testfile)
> +if [[ "$actual_data" != "$expected_data" ]]
> +then
> + echo "Checksum match failed at off: $torn_aw_offset size: $awu_max"
> + echo
> + echo "Expected: "
> + echo "$expected_data"
> + echo
> + echo "Actual contents: "
> + echo "$actual_data"
> +
> + _fail
> +fi
> +
> +echo -n "Data verification at offset $torn_aw_offset suceeded!" >> $seqres.full
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/063.out b/tests/ext4/063.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..de35fc52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/063.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 063
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-12 14:12 [PATCH v3 00/13] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] common/rc: Fix fsx for ext4 with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] generic/1226: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 13:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-17 13:52 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 14:06 ` John Garry
2025-07-22 8:47 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-07-23 13:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 16:25 ` John Garry
2025-07-25 6:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-25 8:14 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 6:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 9:09 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 13:35 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 14:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-29 6:11 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 14:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-31 4:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-31 7:58 ` John Garry
2025-08-01 6:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-01 8:23 ` John Garry
2025-08-02 6:49 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-04 7:12 ` John Garry
2025-08-08 6:00 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] generic/1227: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-28 8:58 ` Zorro Lang
2025-07-28 9:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-23 13:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 9:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] generic/1229: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-23 6:30 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] generic/1230: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ext4/061: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 13:56 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ext4/062: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4/063: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-30 14:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] ext4/064: Add atomic write tests for journal credit calculation Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729194154.GT2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox