From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] ext4/061: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:47:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729194708.GV2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b59eb50b171dece1a15bc7c1b6cadff438586d6.1752329098.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:42:52PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>
> We brute force all possible blocksize & clustersize combinations on
> a bigalloc filesystem for stressing atomic write using fio data crc
> verifier. We run nproc * $LOAD_FACTOR threads in parallel writing to
> a single $SCRATCH_MNT/test-file. With atomic writes this test ensures
> that we never see the mix of data contents from different threads on
> a given bsrange.
Err, how does this differ from the next patch? It looks like this one
creates one IO thread, whereas the next one creates 8? If so, what does
this test add over ext4/062?
(and now that I look at it, ext4/062 says "FS QA Test 061"...)
--D
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/ext4/061 | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/061.out | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/061
> create mode 100644 tests/ext4/061.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/061 b/tests/ext4/061
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..a0e49249
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/061
> @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 061
> +#
> +# Brute force all possible blocksize clustersize combination on a bigalloc
> +# filesystem for stressing atomic write using fio data crc verifier. We run
> +# nproc * 2 * $LOAD_FACTOR threads in parallel writing to a single
> +# $SCRATCH_MNT/test-file. With fio aio-dio atomic write this test ensures that
> +# we should never see the mix of data contents from different threads for any
> +# given fio blocksize.
> +#
> +
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +
> +_begin_fstest auto rw stress atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> +_require_aiodio
> +
> +FIO_LOAD=$(($(nproc) * 2 * LOAD_FACTOR))
> +SIZE=$((100*1024*1024))
> +fiobsize=4096
> +
> +# Calculate fsblocksize as per bdev atomic write units.
> +bdev_awu_min=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_min $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +bdev_awu_max=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max $SCRATCH_DEV)
> +fsblocksize=$(_max 4096 "$bdev_awu_min")
> +
> +function create_fio_configs()
> +{
> + create_fio_aw_config
> + create_fio_verify_config
> +}
> +
> +function create_fio_verify_config()
> +{
> +cat >$fio_verify_config <<EOF
> + [aio-dio-aw-verify]
> + direct=1
> + ioengine=libaio
> + rw=randwrite
> + bs=$fiobsize
> + fallocate=native
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-file
> + size=$SIZE
> + iodepth=$FIO_LOAD
> + numjobs=$FIO_LOAD
> + atomic=1
> + group_reporting=1
> +
> + verify_only=1
> + verify_state_save=0
> + verify=crc32c
> + verify_fatal=1
> + verify_write_sequence=0
> +EOF
> +}
> +
> +function create_fio_aw_config()
> +{
> +cat >$fio_aw_config <<EOF
> + [aio-dio-aw]
> + direct=1
> + ioengine=libaio
> + rw=randwrite
> + bs=$fiobsize
> + fallocate=native
> + filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-file
> + size=$SIZE
> + iodepth=$FIO_LOAD
> + numjobs=$FIO_LOAD
> + group_reporting=1
> + atomic=1
> +
> + verify_state_save=0
> + verify=crc32c
> + do_verify=0
> +
> +EOF
> +}
> +
> +# Let's create a sample fio config to check whether fio supports all options.
> +fio_aw_config=$tmp.aw.fio
> +fio_verify_config=$tmp.verify.fio
> +fio_out=$tmp.fio.out
> +
> +create_fio_configs
> +_require_fio $fio_aw_config
> +
> +for ((fsblocksize=$fsblocksize; fsblocksize <= $(_get_page_size); fsblocksize = $fsblocksize << 1)); do
> + # cluster sizes above 16 x blocksize are experimental so avoid them
> + # Also, cap cluster size at 128kb to keep it reasonable for large
> + # blocks size
> + fs_max_clustersize=$(_min $((16 * fsblocksize)) "$bdev_awu_max" $((128 * 1024)))
> +
> + for ((fsclustersize=$fsblocksize; fsclustersize <= $fs_max_clustersize; fsclustersize = $fsclustersize << 1)); do
> + for ((fiobsize = $fsblocksize; fiobsize <= $fsclustersize; fiobsize = $fiobsize << 1)); do
> + MKFS_OPTIONS="-O bigalloc -b $fsblocksize -C $fsclustersize"
> + _scratch_mkfs_ext4 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || continue
> + if _try_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1; then
> + echo "== FIO test for fsblocksize=$fsblocksize fsclustersize=$fsclustersize fiobsize=$fiobsize ==" >> $seqres.full
> +
> + touch $SCRATCH_MNT/f1
> + create_fio_configs
> +
> + cat $fio_aw_config >> $seqres.full
> + echo >> $seqres.full
> + cat $fio_verify_config >> $seqres.full
> +
> + $FIO_PROG $fio_aw_config >> $seqres.full
> + ret1=$?
> +
> + $FIO_PROG $fio_verify_config >> $seqres.full
> + ret2=$?
> +
> + _scratch_unmount
> +
> + [[ $ret1 -eq 0 && $ret2 -eq 0 ]] || _fail "fio with atomic write failed"
> + fi
> + done
> + done
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo Silence is golden
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/061.out b/tests/ext4/061.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..273be9e0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/061.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 061
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-12 14:12 [PATCH v3 00/13] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] common/rc: Fix fsx for ext4 with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] generic/1226: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 13:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-17 13:52 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 14:06 ` John Garry
2025-07-22 8:47 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-07-23 13:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 16:25 ` John Garry
2025-07-25 6:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-25 8:14 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 6:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 9:09 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 13:35 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 14:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-29 6:11 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 14:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-31 4:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-31 7:58 ` John Garry
2025-08-01 6:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-01 8:23 ` John Garry
2025-08-02 6:49 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-04 7:12 ` John Garry
2025-08-08 6:00 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] generic/1227: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-28 8:58 ` Zorro Lang
2025-07-28 9:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-23 13:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 9:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] generic/1229: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-23 6:30 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] generic/1230: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ext4/061: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-30 13:56 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ext4/062: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4/063: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 14:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] ext4/064: Add atomic write tests for journal credit calculation Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729194708.GV2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox