From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] generic/1229: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:22:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250717162230.GH2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e1e7d552e91fab58037b7b35ffbf8b2e7070be5.1752329098.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:42:50PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Stress file with atomic writes to ensure we excercise codepaths
> where we are mixing different FS operations with atomic writes
>
> Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Hrm, doesn't generic/521 test this already if the fs happens to support
atomic writes?
--D
> ---
> tests/generic/1229 | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/1229.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/1229
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/1229.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/1229 b/tests/generic/1229
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..98e9b50c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/1229
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 1229
> +#
> +# fuzz fsx with atomic writes
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +_begin_fstest rw auto quick atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_odirect
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> +touch $testfile
> +
> +awu_max=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max $testfile)
> +blksz=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> +bsize=`$here/src/min_dio_alignment $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_DEV`
> +
> +# fsx usage:
> +#
> +# -N numops: total # operations to do
> +# -l flen: the upper bound on file size
> +# -o oplen: the upper bound on operation size (64k default)
> +# -Z: O_DIRECT ()
> +
> +_run_fsx_on_file $testfile -N 10000 -o $awu_max -A -l 500000 -r $bsize -w $bsize -Z $FSX_AVOID >> $seqres.full
> +if [[ "$?" != "0" ]]
> +then
> + _fail "fsx returned error: $?"
> +fi
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/1229.out b/tests/generic/1229.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..737d61c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/1229.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 1229
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-17 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-12 14:12 [PATCH v3 00/13] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] common/rc: Fix fsx for ext4 with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-22 9:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] generic/1226: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 13:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-17 13:52 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 14:06 ` John Garry
2025-07-22 8:47 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-07-23 13:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 16:25 ` John Garry
2025-07-25 6:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-25 8:14 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 6:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 9:09 ` John Garry
2025-07-28 13:35 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-28 14:00 ` John Garry
2025-07-29 6:11 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 14:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-31 4:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-31 7:58 ` John Garry
2025-08-01 6:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-01 8:23 ` John Garry
2025-08-02 6:49 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-04 7:12 ` John Garry
2025-08-08 6:00 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] generic/1227: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-28 8:58 ` Zorro Lang
2025-07-28 9:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-23 13:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 9:41 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] generic/1229: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-17 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-23 6:30 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-23 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] generic/1230: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ext4/061: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 13:56 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ext4/062: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4/063: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 14:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-12 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] ext4/064: Add atomic write tests for journal credit calculation Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-07-29 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250717162230.GH2672039@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox