* [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks
@ 2025-11-04 13:17 Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Yang Erkun @ 2025-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack
Cc: yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun, yangerkun
IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or
dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten
extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't
zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides,
even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't
actually be any issues.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index e99306a8f47c..e8bac93ca668 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static int ext4_map_query_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags)
{
- struct extent_status es;
unsigned int status;
int err, retval = 0;
@@ -644,16 +643,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return err;
}
- /*
- * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update
- * extent status tree.
- */
- if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO &&
- ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) {
- if (ext4_es_is_written(&es))
- return retval;
- }
-
status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, map->m_pblk,
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO
2025-11-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 13:17 ` Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:06 ` Zhang Yi
2025-11-04 14:32 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks Yang Erkun
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Yang Erkun @ 2025-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack
Cc: yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun, yangerkun
This flag has been generalized to split an unwritten extent when we do
dio or dioread_nolock writeback, or to avoid merge new extents which was
created by extents split. Update some related comments too.
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 21 +++++++++++++++------
fs/ext4/extents.c | 16 ++++++++--------
include/trace/events/ext4.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 57087da6c7be..96d7d649ccb0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -694,13 +694,22 @@ enum {
/* Caller is from the delayed allocation writeout path
* finally doing the actual allocation of delayed blocks */
#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE 0x0004
- /* caller is from the direct IO path, request to creation of an
- unwritten extents if not allocated, split the unwritten
- extent if blocks has been preallocated already*/
-#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO 0x0008
-#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT 0x0010
-#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO|\
+ /*
+ * This means that we cannot merge newly allocated extents, and if we
+ * found an unwritten extent, we need to split it.
+ */
+#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE 0x0008
+ /*
+ * Caller is from the dio or dioread_nolock buffer writeback,
+ * request to creation of an unwritten extent if not exist or split
+ * the found unwritten extent. Also do not merge the new create
+ * unwritten extent, io end will convert unwritten to written, and
+ * try to merge the written extent.
+ */
+#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE|\
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNWRIT_EXT)
+ /* Convert unwritten extent to initialized. */
+#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT 0x0010
/* Eventual metadata allocation (due to growing extent tree)
* should not fail, so try to use reserved blocks for that.*/
#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL 0x0020
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index ca5499e9412b..241b5f5d29ad 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ ext4_force_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
int nofail)
{
int unwritten = ext4_ext_is_unwritten(path[path->p_depth].p_ext);
- int flags = EXT4_EX_NOCACHE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
+ int flags = EXT4_EX_NOCACHE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
if (nofail)
flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL | EXT4_EX_NOFAIL;
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
}
/* try to insert block into found extent and return */
- if (ex && !(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
+ if (ex && !(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE)) {
/*
* Try to see whether we should rather test the extent on
@@ -2181,7 +2181,7 @@ ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
merge:
/* try to merge extents */
- if (!(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO))
+ if (!(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE))
ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, nearex);
/* time to correct all indexes above */
@@ -3224,7 +3224,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
else
ext4_ext_mark_initialized(ex);
- if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO))
+ if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE))
ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, ex);
err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + path->p_depth);
@@ -3368,7 +3368,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
if (map->m_lblk + map->m_len < ee_block + ee_len) {
split_flag1 = split_flag & EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT;
- flags1 = flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
+ flags1 = flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
if (unwritten)
split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1 |
EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2;
@@ -3739,7 +3739,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_convert_extents(handle_t *handle,
EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT : 0;
split_flag |= (EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 | EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2);
}
- flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
+ flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
return ext4_split_extent(handle, inode, path, map, split_flag, flags,
allocated);
}
@@ -3911,7 +3911,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
*allocated, newblock);
/* get_block() before submitting IO, split the extent */
- if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO) {
+ if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE) {
path = ext4_split_convert_extents(handle, inode, map, path,
flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, allocated);
if (IS_ERR(path))
@@ -5618,7 +5618,7 @@ static int ext4_insert_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
path = ext4_split_extent_at(handle, inode, path,
start_lblk, split_flag,
EXT4_EX_NOCACHE |
- EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO |
+ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE |
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL);
}
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
index a374e7ea7e57..ada2b9223df5 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct partial_cluster;
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE, "CREATE" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT, "UNWRIT" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE, "DELALLOC" }, \
- { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, "PRE_IO" }, \
+ { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE, "SPLIT_NOMERGE" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL, "METADATA_NOFAIL" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE, "NO_NORMALIZE" }, \
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks
2025-11-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 13:17 ` Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Jan Kara
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Yang Erkun @ 2025-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack
Cc: yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun, yangerkun
Retval from ext4_map_create_blocks means we really create some blocks,
cannot happened with m_flags without EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN and
EXT4_MAP_MAPPED.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index e8bac93ca668..3d8ada26d5cd 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -799,7 +799,13 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
retval = ext4_map_create_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags);
up_write((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
- if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) {
+
+ if (retval < 0)
+ ext_debug(inode, "failed with err %d\n", retval);
+ if (retval <= 0)
+ return retval;
+
+ if (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) {
ret = check_block_validity(inode, map);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
@@ -828,12 +834,8 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return ret;
}
}
- if (retval > 0 && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ||
- map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED))
- ext4_fc_track_range(handle, inode, map->m_lblk,
- map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1);
- if (retval < 0)
- ext_debug(inode, "failed with err %d\n", retval);
+ ext4_fc_track_range(handle, inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_lblk +
+ map->m_len - 1);
return retval;
}
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO
2025-11-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 13:17 ` Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-04 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Jan Kara
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Yang Erkun @ 2025-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack
Cc: yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun, yangerkun
Since the size will be updated after the DIO completes, the data
will not be shown to userspace before that.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++--
include/trace/events/ext4.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 96d7d649ccb0..d0331697467d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ enum {
#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL 0x0020
/* Don't normalize allocation size (used for fallocate) */
#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE 0x0040
+ /* Get blocks from DIO */
+#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO 0x0080
/* Convert written extents to unwritten */
#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN 0x0100
/* Write zeros to newly created written extents */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 3d8ada26d5cd..168dbcc9e921 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -818,6 +818,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW &&
!(map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN) &&
!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO) &&
+ !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO) &&
!ext4_is_quota_file(inode) &&
ext4_should_order_data(inode)) {
loff_t start_byte =
@@ -3729,9 +3730,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_alloc(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map,
* happening and thus expose allocated blocks to direct I/O reads.
*/
else if (((loff_t)map->m_lblk << blkbits) >= i_size_read(inode))
- m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
+ m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
else if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
- m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT;
+ m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
ret = ext4_map_blocks_atomic_write(handle, inode, map, m_flags,
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
index ada2b9223df5..de6d848f2e37 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct partial_cluster;
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL, "METADATA_NOFAIL" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE, "NO_NORMALIZE" }, \
+ { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO, "DIO" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN, "CONVERT_UNWRITTEN" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO, "ZERO" }, \
{ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_SUBMIT, "IO_SUBMIT" }, \
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 14:06 ` Zhang Yi
2025-11-04 14:32 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Yi @ 2025-11-04 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Erkun, linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack; +Cc: libaokun1, yangerkun
On 11/4/2025 9:17 PM, Yang Erkun wrote:
> This flag has been generalized to split an unwritten extent when we do
> dio or dioread_nolock writeback, or to avoid merge new extents which was
> created by extents split. Update some related comments too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> include/trace/events/ext4.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 57087da6c7be..96d7d649ccb0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -694,13 +694,22 @@ enum {
> /* Caller is from the delayed allocation writeout path
> * finally doing the actual allocation of delayed blocks */
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE 0x0004
> - /* caller is from the direct IO path, request to creation of an
> - unwritten extents if not allocated, split the unwritten
> - extent if blocks has been preallocated already*/
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO 0x0008
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT 0x0010
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO|\
> + /*
> + * This means that we cannot merge newly allocated extents, and if we
> + * found an unwritten extent, we need to split it.
> + */
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE 0x0008
> + /*
> + * Caller is from the dio or dioread_nolock buffer writeback,
> + * request to creation of an unwritten extent if not exist or split
> + * the found unwritten extent. Also do not merge the new create
> + * unwritten extent, io end will convert unwritten to written, and
> + * try to merge the written extent.
> + */
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE|\
> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNWRIT_EXT)
> + /* Convert unwritten extent to initialized. */
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT 0x0010
> /* Eventual metadata allocation (due to growing extent tree)
> * should not fail, so try to use reserved blocks for that.*/
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL 0x0020
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index ca5499e9412b..241b5f5d29ad 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ ext4_force_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> int nofail)
> {
> int unwritten = ext4_ext_is_unwritten(path[path->p_depth].p_ext);
> - int flags = EXT4_EX_NOCACHE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
> + int flags = EXT4_EX_NOCACHE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
>
> if (nofail)
> flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL | EXT4_EX_NOFAIL;
> @@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> /* try to insert block into found extent and return */
> - if (ex && !(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO)) {
> + if (ex && !(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE)) {
>
> /*
> * Try to see whether we should rather test the extent on
> @@ -2181,7 +2181,7 @@ ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>
> merge:
> /* try to merge extents */
> - if (!(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO))
> + if (!(gb_flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE))
> ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, nearex);
>
> /* time to correct all indexes above */
> @@ -3224,7 +3224,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
> else
> ext4_ext_mark_initialized(ex);
>
> - if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO))
> + if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE))
> ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, ex);
>
> err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + path->p_depth);
> @@ -3368,7 +3368,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
>
> if (map->m_lblk + map->m_len < ee_block + ee_len) {
> split_flag1 = split_flag & EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT;
> - flags1 = flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
> + flags1 = flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
> if (unwritten)
> split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1 |
> EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2;
> @@ -3739,7 +3739,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_convert_extents(handle_t *handle,
> EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT : 0;
> split_flag |= (EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 | EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2);
> }
> - flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO;
> + flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
> return ext4_split_extent(handle, inode, path, map, split_flag, flags,
> allocated);
> }
> @@ -3911,7 +3911,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> *allocated, newblock);
>
> /* get_block() before submitting IO, split the extent */
> - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO) {
> + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE) {
> path = ext4_split_convert_extents(handle, inode, map, path,
> flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, allocated);
> if (IS_ERR(path))
> @@ -5618,7 +5618,7 @@ static int ext4_insert_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> path = ext4_split_extent_at(handle, inode, path,
> start_lblk, split_flag,
> EXT4_EX_NOCACHE |
> - EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO |
> + EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE |
> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> index a374e7ea7e57..ada2b9223df5 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct partial_cluster;
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE, "CREATE" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT, "UNWRIT" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE, "DELALLOC" }, \
> - { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, "PRE_IO" }, \
> + { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE, "SPLIT_NOMERGE" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL, "METADATA_NOFAIL" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE, "NO_NORMALIZE" }, \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks
2025-11-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Yang Erkun
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 14:28 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-05 1:39 ` yangerkun
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-11-04 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Erkun
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, libaokun1,
yangerkun
On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:47, Yang Erkun wrote:
> IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or
> dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten
> extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't
> zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides,
> even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't
> actually be any issues.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
I agree the check isn't needed for correctness but it seems to be
reasonable performance optimization for a common case of writing back
already written data in dioread_nolock mode?
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 -----------
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index e99306a8f47c..e8bac93ca668 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static int ext4_map_query_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags)
> {
> - struct extent_status es;
> unsigned int status;
> int err, retval = 0;
>
> @@ -644,16 +643,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> return err;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update
> - * extent status tree.
> - */
> - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO &&
> - ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) {
> - if (ext4_es_is_written(&es))
> - return retval;
> - }
> -
> status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
> EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
> ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, map->m_pblk,
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:06 ` Zhang Yi
@ 2025-11-04 14:32 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-11-04 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Erkun
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, libaokun1,
yangerkun
On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:48, Yang Erkun wrote:
> This flag has been generalized to split an unwritten extent when we do
> dio or dioread_nolock writeback, or to avoid merge new extents which was
> created by extents split. Update some related comments too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Just a few spelling corrections. Otherwise I like the patch. Feel free to
add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> + /*
> + * Caller is from the dio or dioread_nolock buffer writeback,
^^^ buffered IO
> + * request to creation of an unwritten extent if not exist or split
^^ create an unwritten extent if it does not exist
> + * the found unwritten extent. Also do not merge the new create
^^^ newly created
> + * unwritten extent, io end will convert unwritten to written, and
> + * try to merge the written extent.
> + */
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 14:36 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-11-04 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Erkun
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, libaokun1,
yangerkun
On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:49, Yang Erkun wrote:
> Retval from ext4_map_create_blocks means we really create some blocks,
> cannot happened with m_flags without EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN and
> EXT4_MAP_MAPPED.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index e8bac93ca668..3d8ada26d5cd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -799,7 +799,13 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> retval = ext4_map_create_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags);
> up_write((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem));
> - if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) {
> +
> + if (retval < 0)
> + ext_debug(inode, "failed with err %d\n", retval);
> + if (retval <= 0)
> + return retval;
> +
> + if (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) {
> ret = check_block_validity(inode, map);
> if (ret != 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -828,12 +834,8 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> return ret;
> }
> }
> - if (retval > 0 && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ||
> - map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED))
> - ext4_fc_track_range(handle, inode, map->m_lblk,
> - map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1);
> - if (retval < 0)
> - ext_debug(inode, "failed with err %d\n", retval);
> + ext4_fc_track_range(handle, inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_lblk +
> + map->m_len - 1);
> return retval;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO Yang Erkun
@ 2025-11-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 11:54 ` yangerkun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-11-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Erkun
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, libaokun1,
yangerkun
On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:50, Yang Erkun wrote:
> Since the size will be updated after the DIO completes, the data
> will not be shown to userspace before that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Hum, is there some measurable performance benefit from this? If yes, it
would be good to mention it in the changelog. If not, then why bother?
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++--
> include/trace/events/ext4.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 96d7d649ccb0..d0331697467d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ enum {
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL 0x0020
> /* Don't normalize allocation size (used for fallocate) */
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE 0x0040
> + /* Get blocks from DIO */
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO 0x0080
> /* Convert written extents to unwritten */
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN 0x0100
> /* Write zeros to newly created written extents */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 3d8ada26d5cd..168dbcc9e921 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -818,6 +818,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> if (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW &&
> !(map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN) &&
> !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO) &&
> + !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO) &&
> !ext4_is_quota_file(inode) &&
> ext4_should_order_data(inode)) {
> loff_t start_byte =
> @@ -3729,9 +3730,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_alloc(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map,
> * happening and thus expose allocated blocks to direct I/O reads.
> */
> else if (((loff_t)map->m_lblk << blkbits) >= i_size_read(inode))
> - m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
> + m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
> else if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
> - m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT;
> + m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
>
> if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
> ret = ext4_map_blocks_atomic_write(handle, inode, map, m_flags,
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> index ada2b9223df5..de6d848f2e37 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct partial_cluster;
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL, "METADATA_NOFAIL" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE, "NO_NORMALIZE" }, \
> + { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO, "DIO" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN, "CONVERT_UNWRITTEN" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO, "ZERO" }, \
> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_SUBMIT, "IO_SUBMIT" }, \
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks
2025-11-04 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Jan Kara
@ 2025-11-05 1:39 ` yangerkun
2025-11-05 10:20 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: yangerkun @ 2025-11-05 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun
在 2025/11/4 22:28, Jan Kara 写道:
> On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:47, Yang Erkun wrote:
>> IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or
>> dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten
>> extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't
>> zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides,
>> even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't
>> actually be any issues.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
>
> I agree the check isn't needed for correctness but it seems to be
> reasonable performance optimization for a common case of writing back
> already written data in dioread_nolock mode?
Hi!
Thank you for your detailed review! I believe you are referring to
writing back a block within the written extent in dioread_nolock mode.
If that's the case, we might never enter ext4_map_create_blocks because
ext4_map_query_blocks will return the block as MAPPED. Please correct me
if I misunderstood!
Thanks,
Erkun.
>
> Honza
>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 -----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index e99306a8f47c..e8bac93ca668 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static int ext4_map_query_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags)
>> {
>> - struct extent_status es;
>> unsigned int status;
>> int err, retval = 0;
>>
>> @@ -644,16 +643,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> - /*
>> - * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update
>> - * extent status tree.
>> - */
>> - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO &&
>> - ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) {
>> - if (ext4_es_is_written(&es))
>> - return retval;
>> - }
>> -
>> status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
>> EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
>> ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, map->m_pblk,
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks
2025-11-05 1:39 ` yangerkun
@ 2025-11-05 10:20 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-11-05 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yangerkun
Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, yi.zhang, libaokun1,
yangerkun
On Wed 05-11-25 09:39:01, yangerkun wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/11/4 22:28, Jan Kara 写道:
> > On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:47, Yang Erkun wrote:
> > > IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or
> > > dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten
> > > extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't
> > > zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides,
> > > even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't
> > > actually be any issues.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> >
> > I agree the check isn't needed for correctness but it seems to be
> > reasonable performance optimization for a common case of writing back
> > already written data in dioread_nolock mode?
>
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for your detailed review! I believe you are referring to
> writing back a block within the written extent in dioread_nolock mode.
> If that's the case, we might never enter ext4_map_create_blocks because
> ext4_map_query_blocks will return the block as MAPPED. Please correct me
> if I misunderstood!
No, you're correct and I was confused. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO
2025-11-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
@ 2025-11-07 11:54 ` yangerkun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: yangerkun @ 2025-11-07 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, yi.zhang, libaokun1, yangerkun
在 2025/11/4 23:07, Jan Kara 写道:
> On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:50, Yang Erkun wrote:
>> Since the size will be updated after the DIO completes, the data
>> will not be shown to userspace before that.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
>
> Hum, is there some measurable performance benefit from this? If yes, it
> would be good to mention it in the changelog. If not, then why bother?
Hi,
I discovered this while debugging. Today, I also conducted some
performance tests on this patch, but it appears that there is no
noticeable improvement. Therefore, I agree with your suggestion and will
remove it in the next version!
Thanks,
Erkun.
>
> Honza
>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++--
>> include/trace/events/ext4.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> index 96d7d649ccb0..d0331697467d 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ enum {
>> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL 0x0020
>> /* Don't normalize allocation size (used for fallocate) */
>> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE 0x0040
>> + /* Get blocks from DIO */
>> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO 0x0080
>> /* Convert written extents to unwritten */
>> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN 0x0100
>> /* Write zeros to newly created written extents */
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index 3d8ada26d5cd..168dbcc9e921 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -818,6 +818,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> if (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW &&
>> !(map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN) &&
>> !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO) &&
>> + !(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO) &&
>> !ext4_is_quota_file(inode) &&
>> ext4_should_order_data(inode)) {
>> loff_t start_byte =
>> @@ -3729,9 +3730,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_alloc(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map,
>> * happening and thus expose allocated blocks to direct I/O reads.
>> */
>> else if (((loff_t)map->m_lblk << blkbits) >= i_size_read(inode))
>> - m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
>> + m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
>> else if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
>> - m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT;
>> + m_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO;
>>
>> if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
>> ret = ext4_map_blocks_atomic_write(handle, inode, map, m_flags,
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
>> index ada2b9223df5..de6d848f2e37 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct partial_cluster;
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL, "METADATA_NOFAIL" }, \
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE, "NO_NORMALIZE" }, \
>> + { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO, "DIO" }, \
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN, "CONVERT_UNWRITTEN" }, \
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO, "ZERO" }, \
>> { EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_SUBMIT, "IO_SUBMIT" }, \
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-07 11:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-04 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: rename EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:06 ` Zhang Yi
2025-11-04 14:32 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: cleanup for ext4_map_blocks Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 14:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-04 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: order mode should not take effect for DIO Yang Erkun
2025-11-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 11:54 ` yangerkun
2025-11-04 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Jan Kara
2025-11-05 1:39 ` yangerkun
2025-11-05 10:20 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox