From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhang Yi" <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:15:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814101548.7E86E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814093331.1703882-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Reading uninitialized `map->m_seq` on error paths leads to an infinite retry loop in `ext4_map_blocks()`, causing a kernel hard lockup.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation ---
commit 6ae9b515f2027351280fce82734e7e8361a281e7
Author: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation
After acquiring i_data_sem in write mode, recheck that the mapping
found via the extent status tree or disk query has not changed. If
we find a valid extent and the sequence number has changed, retry
the entire lookup to obtain the correct trimmed mapping.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 9dbece14ae569..548a3968c5a7d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -820,6 +821,19 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> * with create == 1 flag.
> */
> down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +
> + /*
> + * Check the validity of the mapping found via the extent status
> + * tree or the disk query. A racing truncate may have changed the
> + * extent, since writeback does not hold i_rwsem or the folio locks
> + * covering the full extent.
> + */
> + if (map->m_seq != READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_seq)) {
> + up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> + map->m_flags = 0;
> + map->m_len = orig_mlen;
> + goto create_retry;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Could this cause an infinite loop and hard lockup on disk error?
If ext4_map_query_blocks() encounters an error like -EIO or -EFSCORRUPTED,
it returns < 0 without setting map->m_seq.
However, if EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE is set, the function does not return
early on error and falls through to this TOCTOU check.
Since callers like _ext4_get_block() allocate struct ext4_map_blocks
on the stack:
fs/ext4/inode.c:_ext4_get_block() {
struct ext4_map_blocks map;
...
map.m_lblk = iblock;
map.m_len = bh->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits;
ret = ext4_map_blocks(..., &map, flags);
}
Will map->m_seq contain uninitialized stack garbage, causing the sequence
check to mismatch and jump to create_retry, which then encounters the exact
same disk error indefinitely?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814093331.1703882-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 9:32 [PATCH -next v5 00/32] ext4: use iomap for regular file's buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 01/32] ext4: simplify size updating in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 02/32] ext4: factor out ext4_truncate_[up|down]() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 03/32] ext4: simplify error handling in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 04/32] ext4: skip ordered I/O wait when zeroing beyond i_disksize block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 05/32] ext4: set EXT4_MAP_NEW flag for delayed allocated blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 07/32] ext4: fix orig_mlen initialization in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 08/32] ext4: allow ext4_map_blocks() to start its own transaction handle Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 09/32] ext4: avoid unnecessary transaction in ext4_map_blocks() for unwritten extents Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 10/32] ext4: skip block allocation for holes in the data submission path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 11/32] ext4: add iomap address space operations for buffered I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 12/32] ext4: implement buffered read path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 13/32] ext4: pass out extent seq counter when mapping da blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 14/32] ext4: do not use data=ordered mode for inodes using buffered iomap path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 15/32] ext4: implement buffered write path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 16/32] ext4: implement writeback " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 17/32] ext4: implement mmap " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 18/32] ext4: implement partial block zero range " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 19/32] ext4: tolerate unexpected holes in ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 20/32] ext4: add block mapping tracepoints for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 21/32] ext4: disable online defrag when inode using " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 22/32] ext4: add EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING state bit and helpers Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 23/32] ext4: submit and wait for pending disksize-grow I/O on writeback Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 24/32] ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 25/32] ext4: defer i_disksize update while DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING is set Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 26/32] ext4: submit and wait for disksize-grow I/O in fallocate paths Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 27/32] ext4: clear DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING on truncate or error Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 28/32] ext4: set DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING after zeroing unaligned EOF block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 29/32] ext4: add tracepoints for DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING set, clear, and wait Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 30/32] ext4: add tracepoints for EOF block zeroing and disksize-grow I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 31/32] ext4: partially enable iomap for the buffered I/O path of regular files Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 32/32] ext4: introduce a mount option for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814101548.7E86E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox