From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhang Yi" <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 24/32] ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:25:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814102545.E85101F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814093331.1703882-25-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING state bit is never set anywhere in the codebase, rendering the entire disksize-grow logic and safety mechanism inert.
--
--- Patch [24]: [PATCH -next v5 24/32] ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion ---
commit d834c25602b493451d52cc75b3ae8fd40461bce9
Author: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion
This commit updates the iomap writeback path to advance i_disksize to i_size
upon completion of a disksize-grow I/O. It introduces an is_disksize_grow flag
to ext4_iomap_wb_update_disksize() to trigger this update safely.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 955ff88045db6..4f1176b9332f2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -589,9 +589,36 @@ static int ext4_iomap_wb_update_disksize(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> * i_data_sem.
> */
> down_write(&ei->i_data_sem);
> - new_disksize = min(new_disksize, i_size_read(inode));
> + i_size = i_size_read(inode);
> +
> + /*
> + * EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING is cleared when the pending
> + * I/O completes. However, another thread may have re-set the bit
> + * between that point and here, meaning i_disksize has already
> + * been advanced and a new EOF zeroing has been initiated. In that
> + * case, do not advance i_disksize to i_size; leave it to the
> + * next pending grow ioend.
> + */
> + if (is_disksize_grow &&
> + ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING))
> + is_disksize_grow = false;
[Severity: High]
Is EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING actually set anywhere in the codebase?
It appears this state bit is never set, such as during EOF zeroing in
ext4_block_zero_eof() where there is a TODO comment about tracking the
ordered range.
If the bit is never set, ext4_test_inode_state() will always return false
and this safety check will be bypassed during concurrent fallocate and
truncate operations.
[ ... ]
> @@ -607,6 +634,8 @@ static void ext4_iomap_finish_ioend(struct iomap_ioend *ioend)
> loff_t pos = ioend->io_offset;
> size_t size = ioend->io_size;
> loff_t end = pos + size;
> + unsigned long io_mode = (unsigned long)ioend->io_private;
> + bool is_disksize_grow = (io_mode == EXT4_IOMAP_IOEND_DISKSIZE_GROW_IO);
[Severity: High]
Is EXT4_IOMAP_IOEND_DISKSIZE_GROW_IO ever assigned to ioend->io_private?
Because the EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING bit is never set, it seems
ext4_iomap_get_disksize_pending_range() will always return 0, meaning this
io_mode flag is never assigned.
Does this render the entire disksize-grow logic inert?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814093331.1703882-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com?part=24
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 9:32 [PATCH -next v5 00/32] ext4: use iomap for regular file's buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 01/32] ext4: simplify size updating in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 02/32] ext4: factor out ext4_truncate_[up|down]() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 03/32] ext4: simplify error handling in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 04/32] ext4: skip ordered I/O wait when zeroing beyond i_disksize block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 05/32] ext4: set EXT4_MAP_NEW flag for delayed allocated blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 07/32] ext4: fix orig_mlen initialization in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 08/32] ext4: allow ext4_map_blocks() to start its own transaction handle Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 09/32] ext4: avoid unnecessary transaction in ext4_map_blocks() for unwritten extents Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 10/32] ext4: skip block allocation for holes in the data submission path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 11/32] ext4: add iomap address space operations for buffered I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 12/32] ext4: implement buffered read path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 13/32] ext4: pass out extent seq counter when mapping da blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 14/32] ext4: do not use data=ordered mode for inodes using buffered iomap path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 15/32] ext4: implement buffered write path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 16/32] ext4: implement writeback " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 17/32] ext4: implement mmap " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 18/32] ext4: implement partial block zero range " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 19/32] ext4: tolerate unexpected holes in ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 20/32] ext4: add block mapping tracepoints for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 21/32] ext4: disable online defrag when inode using " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 22/32] ext4: add EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING state bit and helpers Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 23/32] ext4: submit and wait for pending disksize-grow I/O on writeback Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 24/32] ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 25/32] ext4: defer i_disksize update while DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING is set Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 26/32] ext4: submit and wait for disksize-grow I/O in fallocate paths Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 27/32] ext4: clear DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING on truncate or error Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 28/32] ext4: set DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING after zeroing unaligned EOF block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 29/32] ext4: add tracepoints for DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING set, clear, and wait Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 30/32] ext4: add tracepoints for EOF block zeroing and disksize-grow I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 31/32] ext4: partially enable iomap for the buffered I/O path of regular files Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 32/32] ext4: introduce a mount option for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814102545.E85101F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox