From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Should journaled quota be default for ext4?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:30:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAC3860.7010905@redhat.com> (raw)
Ted's email about quotacheck made me think:
Is there a reason that journaled quota is not default for ext4?
(or ext3 for that matter, but we're not messing with that now)
IOW - if we do mount -o quota, is there any reason that we should
also need more options to journal that quota? When would we not
want journaled quota?
(Forgive me if it's a dumb question, I'm not as well versed in
extN quota as I probably should be).
-Eric
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 4:30 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-03-26 14:26 ` Should journaled quota be default for ext4? tytso
2010-03-30 1:17 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-30 2:10 ` tytso
2010-03-30 2:24 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BAC3860.7010905@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox