From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, amir73il@gmail.com,
zlang@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] fstests: add test for inotify isolation on cloned devices
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 00:09:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahP1tCc81ascjwxJ@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c60be06ce79778404079c8b1c1d2e09f64cb38e.1779367627.git.asj@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index 4fd4c2c8af11..605a57947a40 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ export BTRFS_MAP_LOGICAL_PROG=$(type -P btrfs-map-logical)
> export PARTED_PROG="$(type -P parted)"
> export XFS_PROPERTY_PROG="$(type -P xfs_property)"
> export FSCRYPTCTL_PROG="$(type -P fscryptctl)"
> +export INOTIFYWAIT_PROG="$(type -P inotifywait)"
Usually we try to split infrastructure changes like this out into
separate patches.
Also any reason to rely on the obsolete inotify instead of fsnotify?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 12:54 [PATCH v5 0/10] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] fstests: add _clone_mount_option() helper Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] fstests: add test for inotify isolation on cloned devices Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-25 8:35 ` Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] fstests: verify fanotify isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-25 8:20 ` Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] fstests: verify f_fsid for " Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] fstests: verify libblkid resolution of duplicate UUIDs Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] fstests: verify exportfs file handles " Anand Jain
2026-05-21 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] fstests: add pre_clone_tune_uuid() healper Anand Jain
2026-05-21 13:10 ` Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-25 7:31 ` Anand Jain
2026-05-25 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-21 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] fstests: test UUID consistency for clones with metadata_uuid Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahP1tCc81ascjwxJ@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=asj@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox