Linux-f2fs-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:28:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ1C-Cdrwoxp0VCJ@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ0aVDSWpRRqFwl9@google.com>

On Feb 24, 2026 / 03:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/18, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > 
> > A lockdep WARN is observed recently under the following steps:
> > 
> > 1) Create a zoned TCMU device
> > 2) Create a f2fs filesystem on the zoned TCMU device and mount it
> > 3) Fill the filesystem with files and trigger GC
> > 4) Unmout the filesystem
> > 5) Remove the zoned TCMU device
> > 
> > The lockdep WARN indicates that a circular lock depedency formed by four
> > contexts, as described below.
> > 
> > a) TCMU device removal context:
> >  - call del_gendisk() to get q->q_usage_counter
> >  - call start_flush_work() to get work_completion of wb->dwork
> > b) f2fs writeback context:
> >  - in wb_workfn(), which holds work_completion of wb->dwork
> >  - call f2fs_balance_fs() to get sbi->gc_lock
> > c) f2fs vfs_write context:
> >  - call f2fs_gc() to get sbi->gc_lock
> >  - call f2fs_write_checkpoint() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
> > d) f2fs mount context:
> >  - call recover_fsync_data() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
> >  - call f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() to call blkdev_report_zones()
> >    that goes down to blk_mq_alloc_request and get q->q_usage_counter
> > 
> > To suppress the WARN, cut the dependency d) between sbi->cp_global_sem
> > and q->q_usage_counter. For that purpose, move the
> > f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() call outside of the critical section
> > of sbi->cp_global_sem in f2fs_recovery_fsync_data(). This change is fine
> > because the write pointer fix operation only affects the main segments
> > and does not interact with the check point metadata. Furthermore,
> > conflicts between the write pointer fix operation and data/node flush
> > operations remain protected by SBI_POR_DOING.
> > 
> > Fixes: c426d99127b1 ("f2fs: Check write pointer consistency of open zones")
> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > index a26071f2b0bc..87fd6cd436fe 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > @@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
> >  		truncate_inode_pages_final(META_MAPPING(sbi));
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If fsync data succeeds or there is no fsync data to recover,
> >  	 * and the f2fs is not read only, check and fix zoned block devices'
> > @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
> >  	if (!err)
> >  		clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
> >  
> > -	f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
> > -
> 
> This was a guard to prevent checkpoint during f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
> where it changes the checkpoint as well?

I checked f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() again, and it does not look
changing the checkpoint to me. FYI, here I show the rough function call chain
from f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() as below. I guess this call chain does
not change the checkpoint, but if I misunderstand anything, please let me know.

 f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
  fix_curseg_write_pointer()
   do_fix_curseg_write_pointer()
    blkdev_report_zones()
     report_one_zone_cb()
    f2fs_allocate_new_section()
     __allocate_new_segment()
      new_curseg()
      locate_dirty_segment()
       __locate_dirty_segment()
       __remove_dirty_segment()
    check_zone_write_pointer()
     __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
     blkdev_zone_mgmt()
     blkdev_issue_zeroout()
    __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
  check_write_pointer(sbi)
   blkdev_report_zones()
    check_zone_writer_pointer_cb()
     check_zone_write_pointer()
      __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
      blkdev_zone_mgmt()
      blkdev_issue_zeroout()

> 
> >  	/* let's drop all the directory inodes for clean checkpoint */
> >  	destroy_fsync_dnodes(&dir_list, err);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.49.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-18 12:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-18 12:52 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24  3:26   ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24  6:28     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-02-27 20:32       ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-04  4:57         ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-04  8:55           ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05  1:38             ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05  1:52               ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05  2:03                 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05  8:49                   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 12:18                     ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZ1C-Cdrwoxp0VCJ@shinmob \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox