From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 20:32:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaH_XCGbYOt6dpba@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ1C-Cdrwoxp0VCJ@shinmob>
On 02/24, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2026 / 03:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/18, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > >
> > > A lockdep WARN is observed recently under the following steps:
> > >
> > > 1) Create a zoned TCMU device
> > > 2) Create a f2fs filesystem on the zoned TCMU device and mount it
> > > 3) Fill the filesystem with files and trigger GC
> > > 4) Unmout the filesystem
> > > 5) Remove the zoned TCMU device
> > >
> > > The lockdep WARN indicates that a circular lock depedency formed by four
> > > contexts, as described below.
> > >
> > > a) TCMU device removal context:
> > > - call del_gendisk() to get q->q_usage_counter
> > > - call start_flush_work() to get work_completion of wb->dwork
> > > b) f2fs writeback context:
> > > - in wb_workfn(), which holds work_completion of wb->dwork
> > > - call f2fs_balance_fs() to get sbi->gc_lock
> > > c) f2fs vfs_write context:
> > > - call f2fs_gc() to get sbi->gc_lock
> > > - call f2fs_write_checkpoint() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
> > > d) f2fs mount context:
> > > - call recover_fsync_data() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
> > > - call f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() to call blkdev_report_zones()
> > > that goes down to blk_mq_alloc_request and get q->q_usage_counter
> > >
> > > To suppress the WARN, cut the dependency d) between sbi->cp_global_sem
> > > and q->q_usage_counter. For that purpose, move the
> > > f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() call outside of the critical section
> > > of sbi->cp_global_sem in f2fs_recovery_fsync_data(). This change is fine
> > > because the write pointer fix operation only affects the main segments
> > > and does not interact with the check point metadata. Furthermore,
> > > conflicts between the write pointer fix operation and data/node flush
> > > operations remain protected by SBI_POR_DOING.
> > >
> > > Fixes: c426d99127b1 ("f2fs: Check write pointer consistency of open zones")
> > > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > index a26071f2b0bc..87fd6cd436fe 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > @@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
> > > truncate_inode_pages_final(META_MAPPING(sbi));
> > > }
> > >
> > > + f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * If fsync data succeeds or there is no fsync data to recover,
> > > * and the f2fs is not read only, check and fix zoned block devices'
> > > @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
> > > if (!err)
> > > clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
> > >
> > > - f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
> > > -
> >
> > This was a guard to prevent checkpoint during f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
> > where it changes the checkpoint as well?
>
> I checked f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() again, and it does not look
> changing the checkpoint to me. FYI, here I show the rough function call chain
> from f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() as below. I guess this call chain does
> not change the checkpoint, but if I misunderstand anything, please let me know.
>
> f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
> fix_curseg_write_pointer()
> do_fix_curseg_write_pointer()
> blkdev_report_zones()
> report_one_zone_cb()
> f2fs_allocate_new_section()
> __allocate_new_segment()
> new_curseg()
E.g., curseg.
> locate_dirty_segment()
> __locate_dirty_segment()
> __remove_dirty_segment()
> check_zone_write_pointer()
> __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
> blkdev_zone_mgmt()
> blkdev_issue_zeroout()
> __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
> check_write_pointer(sbi)
> blkdev_report_zones()
> check_zone_writer_pointer_cb()
> check_zone_write_pointer()
> __f2fs_issue_discard_zone()
> blkdev_zone_mgmt()
> blkdev_issue_zeroout()
>
> >
> > > /* let's drop all the directory inodes for clean checkpoint */
> > > destroy_fsync_dnodes(&dir_list, err);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.49.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 12:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-18 12:52 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 3:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 6:28 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 20:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-03-04 4:57 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-04 8:55 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 1:38 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 1:52 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 2:03 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 8:49 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 12:18 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaH_XCGbYOt6dpba@google.com \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox