From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:55:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da969409-ce10-46fe-8620-b0dfb0cea201@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aae5x_9gpi7utuf0@shinmob>
On 2026/3/4 12:57, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2026 / 20:32, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 02/24, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>> On Feb 24, 2026 / 03:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> On 02/18, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>>>> From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>
>>>>> A lockdep WARN is observed recently under the following steps:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Create a zoned TCMU device
>>>>> 2) Create a f2fs filesystem on the zoned TCMU device and mount it
>>>>> 3) Fill the filesystem with files and trigger GC
>>>>> 4) Unmout the filesystem
>>>>> 5) Remove the zoned TCMU device
>>>>>
>>>>> The lockdep WARN indicates that a circular lock depedency formed by four
>>>>> contexts, as described below.
>>>>>
>>>>> a) TCMU device removal context:
>>>>> - call del_gendisk() to get q->q_usage_counter
>>>>> - call start_flush_work() to get work_completion of wb->dwork
>>>>> b) f2fs writeback context:
>>>>> - in wb_workfn(), which holds work_completion of wb->dwork
>>>>> - call f2fs_balance_fs() to get sbi->gc_lock
>>>>> c) f2fs vfs_write context:
>>>>> - call f2fs_gc() to get sbi->gc_lock
>>>>> - call f2fs_write_checkpoint() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
>>>>> d) f2fs mount context:
>>>>> - call recover_fsync_data() to get sbi->cp_global_sem
>>>>> - call f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() to call blkdev_report_zones()
>>>>> that goes down to blk_mq_alloc_request and get q->q_usage_counter
>>>>>
>>>>> To suppress the WARN, cut the dependency d) between sbi->cp_global_sem
>>>>> and q->q_usage_counter. For that purpose, move the
>>>>> f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() call outside of the critical section
>>>>> of sbi->cp_global_sem in f2fs_recovery_fsync_data(). This change is fine
>>>>> because the write pointer fix operation only affects the main segments
>>>>> and does not interact with the check point metadata. Furthermore,
>>>>> conflicts between the write pointer fix operation and data/node flush
>>>>> operations remain protected by SBI_POR_DOING.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: c426d99127b1 ("f2fs: Check write pointer consistency of open zones")
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> index a26071f2b0bc..87fd6cd436fe 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> @@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
>>>>> truncate_inode_pages_final(META_MAPPING(sbi));
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * If fsync data succeeds or there is no fsync data to recover,
>>>>> * and the f2fs is not read only, check and fix zoned block devices'
>>>>> @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
>>>>> if (!err)
>>>>> clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
>>>>>
>>>>> - f2fs_up_write_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &lc);
>>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> This was a guard to prevent checkpoint during f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
>>>> where it changes the checkpoint as well?
>>>
>>> I checked f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() again, and it does not look
>>> changing the checkpoint to me. FYI, here I show the rough function call chain
>>> from f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer() as below. I guess this call chain does
>>> not change the checkpoint, but if I misunderstand anything, please let me know.
>>>
>>> f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer()
>>> fix_curseg_write_pointer()
>>> do_fix_curseg_write_pointer()
>>> blkdev_report_zones()
>>> report_one_zone_cb()
>>> f2fs_allocate_new_section()
>>> __allocate_new_segment()
>>> new_curseg()
>>
>> E.g., curseg.
>>
>
> Thanks, I looked in do_checkpoint() in fs/f2fs/checkpoing.c, and found it refers
> to cursegs. Then, this patch will allow recording the cursegs in parallel of
> f2fs_check_and_fix_write_pointer(), and it will results in inconsistent curseg
> values in checkpoints. Not good. Let me drop this patch.
>
> I will seek out other ways to avoid the lockdep. I have no idea how to do that
> at this moment, though.
Shinichiro,
IMO, this looks like a false alarm of lockdep, what do you think of this fix?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git/commit/?h=bugfix/syzbot&id=3b19564b95e9ba9803ef30e90eace0977b9d140d
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 3 +++
fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index bb34e864d0ef..5b400e99f332 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -2042,6 +2042,9 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
spinlock_t iostat_lat_lock;
struct iostat_lat_info *iostat_io_lat;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ struct lock_class_key cp_global_sem_key;
+#endif
};
/* Definitions to access f2fs_sb_info */
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 8774c60b4be4..9e85f31fa828 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -4948,6 +4948,9 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
init_f2fs_rwsem_trace(&sbi->gc_lock, sbi, LOCK_NAME_GC_LOCK);
mutex_init(&sbi->writepages);
init_f2fs_rwsem_trace(&sbi->cp_global_sem, sbi, LOCK_NAME_CP_GLOBAL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ lockdep_set_class(&sbi->cp_global_sem, &sbi->cp_global_sem_key);
+#endif
init_f2fs_rwsem_trace(&sbi->node_write, sbi, LOCK_NAME_NODE_WRITE);
init_f2fs_rwsem_trace(&sbi->node_change, sbi, LOCK_NAME_NODE_CHANGE);
spin_lock_init(&sbi->stat_lock);
--
2.49.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 12:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] f2fs: fix lockdep WARN of sbi->cp_global_sem and q->q_usage_counter Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-18 12:52 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Shin'ichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 3:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 6:28 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 20:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-04 4:57 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-04 8:55 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-03-05 1:38 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 1:52 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 2:03 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-05 8:49 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 12:18 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da969409-ce10-46fe-8620-b0dfb0cea201@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox