public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Nicolò Chieffo" <84yelo3@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>,
	Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>,
	Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@ntfs-3g.org>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: interface to ask is a file is hidden
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:57:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081010215722.GG8645@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <641322f90810101300v3ab5fc15hb20fca0374ebe4b4@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:00:28PM +0200, Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:21:04PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> 
> > What files are determined as "hidden" is completely up to the application, and
> > not the filesystem.  Every linux filesystem is going to return all entries in a
> > directory when you do a readdir, and then it is up to the app to cull which
> > entries it doesn't want.  Having the fs/vfs arbitrarily decide which files are
> > "hidden" and shouldn't be returned via readdir is not the correct way to tackle
> > this problem, it should be decided via the application.
> 
> Ok, maybe I was not clear in my request
> 
> As if it's a way to get the size of a file, and this way is common to
> all filesystem (tell me if I'm wrong), we request a common way to ask
> if the file is hidden.

You realie that except for filesystems that are legacy compatible with
Microsoft, the concept of "hidden file" simply doesn't exist?  So when
you say:

> So that the GIO code won't look like this
> 
> if (filesystem_is_ext3(fs))
>     hidden=ext3_get_hidden(file);

Ext3 has no concept of "hidden file".  Niether does ext2, ext4, jfs,
xfs, reseirfs, ufs, etc.

The only ones that would have that concept is vfat (which supports
fat16/fat32), ntfs, nfsv4 and cifs/smbfs.  Even a filesystem which
normally has very bad taste, MacOS's HFS, doesn't support the hidden
attribute.

> If there is a common interface to do this we will gain 2 things
> 1) all filesystem must implement a way to get the hidden attribute

"Must?"  Bzzzt!  There will be many filesystems that have no place to
store a hidden attribute, where the concept doesn't exist.  For
example, NFSv3 simply doesn't possess anything vaguely like a hidden
attribute.  And even if we made a non-standard extension to NFSv3, it
wouldn't be supported by the millions and millions of non-Linux NFSv3
implementations.

The best you might be able to get is an interface that allows an
application to get or set the hidden attribute if is supported --- but
the application must be willing to accept a permission denied error
(some filesystems may only permit people with certain access right or
on some ACL to set the attribute), or a "operation not supported"
failure, for those filesystems that simply have not concept of "hidden
file".

It also means that if a desktop toolkit wants to depend on all
filesystems supporting the concept of hidden files, that's probably a
really bad idea, since it simply doesn't match with reality.

       	   	       	  	 	       - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-10 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-10 19:22 interface to ask is a file is hidden Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 19:21 ` Josef Bacik
2008-10-10 19:35   ` Jeremy Allison
2008-10-10 20:00     ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 19:57       ` Josef Bacik
2008-10-10 20:11         ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 21:57       ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-10-10 22:01         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-13  8:22           ` Alexander Larsson
2008-10-13  9:21             ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-13  9:57             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-13 10:37               ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-13 10:37               ` Alexander Larsson
2008-10-13 10:43                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-13 11:39                   ` Alexander Larsson
2008-10-13 20:44                     ` Jörn Engel
2008-10-13 20:50                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-14  7:20                       ` Alexander Larsson
2008-10-10 22:18         ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-10-10 22:21         ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 22:25           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-10 22:33             ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 22:36               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-10 22:58                 ` Nicolò Chieffo
2008-10-10 23:12                   ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-10-11  0:10                 ` Bryan Henderson
2008-10-11  1:36               ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-10 22:57         ` Brad Boyer
2008-10-13  7:29         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-10-13 10:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-13 10:59           ` Alexander Larsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081010215722.GG8645@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=84yelo3@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexl@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
    --cc=jra@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=szaka@ntfs-3g.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox