reiser4 merging

reiser4 merging

[fresco_pap]

Hi all.

I would like to ask some questions about reiser4 and its merging
into mainline kernel.

I has read discussions on KernelTrap, and I agree with most of
arguments of Andrew Morton and company.

But reiser4 is very flexible, high-performance and enough-stable filesystem,
which must be immediately merged in vanilla kernel, i think.

Could somebody answer me, which requirements should be satisfied by
NameSys developers to merging reiser4 into mainline kernel?


PS: sorry for my english -- I am from Russia...

---
Andrey.

Re: reiser4 merging

[Bryan Henderson]

>which requirements should be satisfied by
>NameSys developers to merging reiser4 into mainline kernel?

The more appropriate question is, "which requirements should be satisfied 
to merge reiser4 into the mainline kernel?"

There's no reason it has to be done by NameSys; anyone who wants (a 
variation of) reiser4 in the mainline kernel can do it.

--
Bryan Henderson                     IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose CA                         Filesystems

Re: reiser4 merging

[Peshehodov Andrey]

On Mon, 24/04/2006 at 09:22 -0700, Bryan Henderson wrote:

> There's no reason it has to be done by NameSys; anyone who wants (a 
> variation of) reiser4 in the mainline kernel can do it.

Yes, of course.

But what concrete changes must bu made in reiser4 to it's merging? 

I would like to ask this questions somebody like Andrew Morton or
Christoph Hellwig, but I "afraid" to digress them. 

May somebody answer me?

---
Andrey.