* Re: [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu
2026-09-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu Ye Liu
@ 2026-09-04 9:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-04 9:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-04 11:06 ` Michal Hocko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-09-04 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ye Liu
Cc: Tony Luck, Reinette Chatre, x86, Christian Brauner, Andrew Morton,
Jann Horn, David Hildenbrand (arm), Mike Rapoport (Microsoft),
Alexey Dobriyan, Lorenzo Stoakes, Ye Liu, Dave Martin,
James Morse, Babu Moger, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On 09/04, Ye Liu wrote:
>
> @@ -1160,8 +1160,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
> if (mm) {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process(p) {
> + for_each_process_rcu(p) {
> if (same_thread_group(task, p))
> continue;
Hmm... I am not aware of for_each_process_rcu(), but looking at this
change I guess it includes something like scope_guard(rcu) ?
Perhaps makes sense, but the naming looks sligthly confusing to me.
I mean, to for_each_process_rcu() looks like (say) list_for_each_entry_rcu()
where _rcu has another meaning...
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu
2026-09-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu Ye Liu
2026-09-04 9:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2026-09-04 9:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-04 11:06 ` Michal Hocko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) @ 2026-09-04 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ye Liu
Cc: Tony Luck, Reinette Chatre, x86, Christian Brauner, Andrew Morton,
Jann Horn, David Hildenbrand (arm), Mike Rapoport (Microsoft),
Alexey Dobriyan, Oleg Nesterov, Ye Liu, Dave Martin, James Morse,
Babu Moger, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
Please cc everybody on every patch in the series :) it makes it incredible hard
for me to see context otherwise.
I can already see a comment I'd like to leave on another patch in the series but
it's a total pain for me go retrieve that to do it.
And I worry about acking one bit only to find out a horrible flaw in another
part :P
Can you please make sure to do that on any respin?...
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 04:29:58PM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
> From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
>
> Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs combined
> with for_each_process() and for_each_process_thread() loops in fs/
> with the for_each_*_rcu() macros.
Probably worth mentioning that they hold the RCU lock in a scoped guard over the
operation.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
In general it looks reasonable to me, but I wonder if you're correctly including
linux/cleanup.h to have the scope guard available...
Anyway can check that on respin with the right cc ;)
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 4 +---
> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 8 ++------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 6a39de424f62..da36ba73dc17 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1160,8 +1160,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
Side-note - I wonder if this really belongs in mm/oom_kill.c? Seems really odd
to have it here.
> if (mm) {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process(p) {
> + for_each_process_rcu(p) {
> if (same_thread_group(task, p))
> continue;
>
> @@ -1177,7 +1176,6 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
> }
> task_unlock(p);
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> mmdrop(mm);
> }
> err_unlock:
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 5dcbb0a964e8..3f96d21b84ab 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -709,14 +709,12 @@ int rdtgroup_tasks_assigned(struct rdtgroup *r)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
> + for_each_process_thread_rcu(p, t) {
> if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r)) {
> ret = 1;
> break;
> }
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -826,15 +824,13 @@ static void show_rdt_tasks(struct rdtgroup *r, struct seq_file *s)
> struct task_struct *p, *t;
> pid_t pid;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
> + for_each_process_thread_rcu(p, t) {
> if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r)) {
> pid = task_pid_vnr(t);
> if (pid)
> seq_printf(s, "%d\n", pid);
> }
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> static int rdtgroup_tasks_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu
2026-09-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rcu Ye Liu
2026-09-04 9:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-04 9:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
@ 2026-09-04 11:06 ` Michal Hocko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2026-09-04 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ye Liu
Cc: Tony Luck, Reinette Chatre, x86, Christian Brauner, Andrew Morton,
Jann Horn, David Hildenbrand (arm), Mike Rapoport (Microsoft),
Alexey Dobriyan, Lorenzo Stoakes, Oleg Nesterov, Ye Liu,
Dave Martin, James Morse, Babu Moger, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Fri 04-09-26 16:29:58, Ye Liu wrote:
> From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
>
> Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs combined
> with for_each_process() and for_each_process_thread() loops in fs/
> with the for_each_*_rcu() macros.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 4 +---
> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 8 ++------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 6a39de424f62..da36ba73dc17 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1160,8 +1160,7 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
> if (mm) {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process(p) {
> + for_each_process_rcu(p) {
> if (same_thread_group(task, p))
> continue;
>
> @@ -1177,7 +1176,6 @@ static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
> }
> task_unlock(p);
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> mmdrop(mm);
> }
> err_unlock:
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 5dcbb0a964e8..3f96d21b84ab 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -709,14 +709,12 @@ int rdtgroup_tasks_assigned(struct rdtgroup *r)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
> + for_each_process_thread_rcu(p, t) {
> if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r)) {
> ret = 1;
> break;
> }
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -826,15 +824,13 @@ static void show_rdt_tasks(struct rdtgroup *r, struct seq_file *s)
> struct task_struct *p, *t;
> pid_t pid;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
> + for_each_process_thread_rcu(p, t) {
> if (is_closid_match(t, r) || is_rmid_match(t, r)) {
> pid = task_pid_vnr(t);
> if (pid)
> seq_printf(s, "%d\n", pid);
> }
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> static int rdtgroup_tasks_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread