* [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Hey Linus,
Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
What I don't love though is how similar the functions
pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
other than which function they in turn call.
Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, or if
you'd rather see something that's totally generic between the two
and figures out which foo_dt_subnode_to_map() function to call*,
or convert pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() to wrappers that pass a function
pointer of the appropriate foo_dt_subnode_to_map() to a shared node
parsing function, or some third option that I have not considered.
If you try to apply this, it's on top of Frank's mux series. It's also
here if any of the spacemit-ters want to look at what I did to their
driver:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/log/?h=spacemit-pinctrl
None of the patches have real commit messages due to this being RFC :)
Cheers,
Conor.
* pinmux/pins + functions/groups + functions I think are the only
really valid combinations here, so it wouldn't be too difficult to
arrange that logic.
CC: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
CC: Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
CC: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
CC: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
CC: spacemit@lists.linux.dev
Conor Dooley (4):
pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass
void data
pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux
pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power()
pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map
implementation
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 20 +++-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 70 +++----------
3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 6 ++----
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
index 83f2d00c732e1..5d99fef27657f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
@@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare
struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
const char **group_name, unsigned int ngroups,
- const char **functions, unsigned int *pins,
- unsigned int npins);
+ void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins);
#else
static inline int
pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
@@ -188,8 +187,7 @@ pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
const char **group_name, unsigned int ngroups,
- const char **functions, unsigned int *pins,
- unsigned int npins)
+ void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins)
{
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
index 76670aef62da4..6a13fd4eea65b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
@@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare
struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
const char **group_names, unsigned int ngroups,
- const char **functions, unsigned int *pins,
- unsigned int npins)
+ void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins)
{
struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
unsigned int num_configs;
@@ -45,7 +44,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, group_name, pins, npins, functions);
+ ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, group_name, pins, npins, data);
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add group %s: %d\n",
group_name, ret);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 14 ++++
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
index 5d99fef27657f..30c42d81e8829 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h
@@ -167,6 +167,11 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
struct pinctrl_map **maps,
unsigned int *num_maps);
+int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps);
+
int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
@@ -182,6 +187,15 @@ pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+static inline int
+pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
static inline int
pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps,
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
index 6a13fd4eea65b..69df211f6b964 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
@@ -202,3 +202,137 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map);
+
+
+static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *parent,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps,
+ unsigned int *num_reserved_maps,
+ const char **group_names,
+ unsigned int ngroups)
+{
+ struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
+ unsigned int *pins, *muxes;
+ int npins, ret;
+
+ npins = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "pinmux");
+
+ if (npins < 1) {
+ dev_err(dev, "invalid pinctrl group %pOFn.%pOFn %d\n",
+ parent, np, npins);
+ return npins;
+ }
+
+ pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pins)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ muxes = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*muxes), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!muxes)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
+ unsigned int pinmux;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "pinmux", i, &pinmux);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pins[i] = pinmux >> 16;
+ muxes[i] = pinmux & GENMASK(15, 0);
+ }
+
+ return pinctrl_generic_to_map(pctldev, parent, np, maps, num_maps,
+ num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups,
+ muxes, pins, npins);
+}
+
+/*
+ * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
+ * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
+ * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
+ * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
+ * adding mappings.
+ *
+ * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin
+ * and the lower 16 the mux setting.
+ */
+int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps)
+{
+ struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
+ struct device_node *child_np;
+ const char **group_names;
+ unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0;
+ int ngroups = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ *maps = NULL;
+ *num_maps = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing
+ * multiple pinmux nodes.
+ */
+ if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux"))
+ goto parent;
+
+ group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!group_names)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np,
+ maps, num_maps,
+ &num_reserved_maps,
+ group_names,
+ ngroups);
+ if (ret) {
+ pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name);
+ }
+
+ ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+parent:
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np)
+ ngroups += 1;
+
+ group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!group_names)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ngroups = 0;
+ for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
+ ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np,
+ maps, num_maps,
+ &num_reserved_maps,
+ group_names,
+ ngroups);
+ if (ret) {
+ pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n",
+ np->name);
+ }
+
+ ngroups++;
+ }
+
+ ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power()
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
AFAICT, this is pointless because generate_config performs this check
too.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 37 ---------------------------
1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
index 62cab6f6cd0a8..41d8a34bc386b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
@@ -409,38 +409,6 @@ static inline u32 spacemit_get_drive_strength_mA(enum spacemit_pin_io_type type,
}
}
-static int spacemit_pctrl_check_power(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
- struct device_node *dn,
- struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *pinmuxs,
- int num_pins, const char *grpname)
-{
- struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
- struct device *dev = pctrl->dev;
- enum spacemit_pin_io_type type;
- u32 power = 0, i;
-
- of_property_read_u32(dn, "power-source", &power);
-
- for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) {
- type = spacemit_to_pin_io_type(pinmuxs[i].pin);
-
- if (type != IO_TYPE_EXTERNAL)
- continue;
-
- switch (power) {
- case PIN_POWER_STATE_1V8:
- case PIN_POWER_STATE_3V3:
- break;
- default:
- dev_err(dev, "group %s has unsupported power\n",
- grpname);
- return -ENOTSUPP;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void spacemit_set_io_pwr_domain(struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl,
const struct spacemit_pin *spin,
const enum spacemit_pin_io_type type)
@@ -548,11 +516,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "failed to get pin %d\n", pins[i]);
}
- ret = spacemit_pctrl_check_power(pctldev, child, pinmuxs,
- npins, grpname);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
map[nmaps].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
map[nmaps].data.mux.function = np->name;
map[nmaps].data.mux.group = grpname;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 33 ++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
index 41d8a34bc386b..c90b6ccfce2ea 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c
@@ -114,11 +114,6 @@ struct spacemit_pinctrl_data {
const struct spacemit_pinctrl_dconf *dconf;
};
-struct spacemit_pin_mux_config {
- const struct spacemit_pin *pin;
- u32 config;
-};
-
/* map pin id to pinctrl register offset, refer MFPR definition */
static unsigned int spacemit_k1_pin_to_offset(unsigned int pin)
{
@@ -474,7 +469,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
ngroups = 0;
guard(mutex)(&pctrl->mutex);
for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
- struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *pinmuxs;
unsigned int config, *pins;
int i, npins;
@@ -497,10 +491,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
if (!pins)
return -ENOMEM;
- pinmuxs = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pinmuxs), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pinmuxs)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
ret = of_property_read_u32_index(child, "pinmux",
i, &config);
@@ -509,11 +499,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return -EINVAL;
pins[i] = spacemit_dt_get_pin(config);
- pinmuxs[i].config = config;
- pinmuxs[i].pin = spacemit_get_pin(pctrl, pins[i]);
-
- if (!pinmuxs[i].pin)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "failed to get pin %d\n", pins[i]);
}
map[nmaps].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
@@ -522,7 +507,7 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
nmaps += 1;
ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, grpname,
- pins, npins, pinmuxs);
+ pins, npins, &config);
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add group %s: %d\n", grpname, ret);
@@ -559,7 +544,7 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops spacemit_pctrl_ops = {
.get_group_name = pinctrl_generic_get_group_name,
.get_group_pins = pinctrl_generic_get_group_pins,
.pin_dbg_show = spacemit_pctrl_dbg_show,
- .dt_node_to_map = spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map,
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map,
.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
};
@@ -568,8 +553,8 @@ static int spacemit_pmx_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
{
struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
const struct group_desc *group;
- const struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *configs;
unsigned int i, mux;
+ unsigned int *configs;
void __iomem *reg;
group = pinctrl_generic_get_group(pctldev, gsel);
@@ -579,11 +564,17 @@ static int spacemit_pmx_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
configs = group->data;
for (i = 0; i < group->grp.npins; i++) {
- const struct spacemit_pin *spin = configs[i].pin;
- u32 value = configs[i].config;
+ const struct spacemit_pin *spin;
+ u32 value = configs[i];
+
+ spin = spacemit_get_pin(pctrl, group->grp.pins[i]);
+ if (!spin) {
+ dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Invalid pin %u\n", group->grp.pins[i]);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
reg = spacemit_pin_to_reg(pctrl, spin->pin);
- mux = spacemit_dt_get_pin_mux(value);
+ mux = value;
guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&pctrl->lock);
value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~PAD_MUX;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-11 20:23 ` Linus Walleij
2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2026-05-11 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
linux-riscv, spacemit
On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
> although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
> limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it.
> What I don't love though is how similar the functions
> pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
> pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
> other than which function they in turn call.
Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive
to the first one?
I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what
it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could
perhaps be names something that make it evident what is
special about it. Not that I have a good idea.
> Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable,
Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin
control core work so I'm happy for everything I get.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij
@ 2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
linux-riscv, spacemit
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1641 bytes --]
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
> > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
> > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
>
> I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it.
Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look
but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in
the interim.
> > What I don't love though is how similar the functions
> > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
> > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
> > other than which function they in turn call.
>
> Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive
> to the first one?
I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code
that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication.
> I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what
> it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could
> perhaps be names something that make it evident what is
> special about it. Not that I have a good idea.
>
> > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable,
>
> Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin
> control core work so I'm happy for everything I get.
Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an
extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and
you can tell me which version you prefer?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
linux-riscv, spacemit
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9547 bytes --]
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
> > > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
> > > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
> >
> > I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it.
>
> Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look
> but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in
> the interim.
>
> > > What I don't love though is how similar the functions
> > > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
> > > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
> > > other than which function they in turn call.
> >
> > Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive
> > to the first one?
>
> I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code
> that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication.
>
> > I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what
> > it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could
> > perhaps be names something that make it evident what is
> > special about it. Not that I have a good idea.
> >
> > > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable,
> >
> > Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin
> > control core work so I'm happy for everything I get.
>
> Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an
> extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and
> you can tell me which version you prefer?
Actually, no need for rfc v2, can just paste here:
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
index d1365acfd1f8c..9759b0186bcc2 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
@@ -119,92 +119,6 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p
functions, pins, npins);
}
-/*
- * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
- * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
- * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
- * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
- * adding mappings.
- */
-int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
- struct device_node *np,
- struct pinctrl_map **maps,
- unsigned int *num_maps)
-{
- struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
- struct device_node *child_np;
- const char **group_names;
- unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0;
- int ngroups = 0;
- int ret;
-
- *maps = NULL;
- *num_maps = 0;
-
- /*
- * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing
- * multiple pins nodes.
- */
- if (!of_property_present(np, "pins"))
- goto parent;
-
- group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!group_names)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np,
- maps, num_maps,
- &num_reserved_maps,
- group_names,
- ngroups);
- if (ret) {
- pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name);
- }
-
- ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-parent:
- for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np)
- ngroups += 1;
-
- group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!group_names)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ngroups = 0;
- for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
- ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np,
- maps, num_maps,
- &num_reserved_maps,
- group_names,
- ngroups);
- if (ret) {
- pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n",
- np->name);
- }
-
- ngroups++;
- }
-
- ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
- return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map);
-
-
static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *np,
@@ -250,20 +164,19 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
muxes, pins, npins);
}
-/*
- * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
- * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
- * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
- * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
- * adding mappings.
- *
- * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin
- * and the lower 16 the mux setting.
- */
-int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+static int pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
struct device_node *np,
struct pinctrl_map **maps,
- unsigned int *num_maps)
+ unsigned int *num_maps,
+ int (dt_subnode_to_map)(
+ struct pinctrl_dev *,
+ struct device_node *,
+ struct device_node *,
+ struct pinctrl_map **,
+ unsigned int *,
+ unsigned int *,
+ const char **,
+ unsigned int))
{
struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
struct device_node *child_np;
@@ -276,21 +189,18 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
*num_maps = 0;
/*
- * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing
- * multiple pinmux nodes.
+ * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing
+ * multiple pins nodes.
*/
- if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux"))
+ if (!of_property_present(np, "pins"))
goto parent;
group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!group_names)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np,
- maps, num_maps,
- &num_reserved_maps,
- group_names,
- ngroups);
+ ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, maps, num_maps,
+ &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups);
if (ret) {
pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name);
@@ -314,11 +224,8 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
ngroups = 0;
for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
- ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np,
- maps, num_maps,
- &num_reserved_maps,
- group_names,
- ngroups);
+ ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, maps, num_maps,
+ &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups);
if (ret) {
pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n",
@@ -336,4 +243,40 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return 0;
}
+
+/*
+ * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
+ * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
+ * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
+ * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
+ * adding mappings.
+ */
+int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps)
+{
+ return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps,
+ &pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map);
+
+/*
+ * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
+ * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
+ * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
+ * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
+ * adding mappings.
+ *
+ * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin
+ * and the lower 16 the mux setting.
+ */
+int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct pinctrl_map **maps,
+ unsigned int *num_maps)
+{
+ return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps,
+ &pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map);
+};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map);
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
linux-riscv, spacemit
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10281 bytes --]
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 08:40:26PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
> > > > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
> > > > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
> > >
> > > I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it.
> >
> > Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look
> > but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in
> > the interim.
> >
> > > > What I don't love though is how similar the functions
> > > > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
> > > > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
> > > > other than which function they in turn call.
> > >
> > > Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive
> > > to the first one?
> >
> > I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code
> > that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication.
> >
> > > I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what
> > > it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could
> > > perhaps be names something that make it evident what is
> > > special about it. Not that I have a good idea.
> > >
> > > > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable,
> > >
> > > Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin
> > > control core work so I'm happy for everything I get.
> >
> > Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an
> > extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and
> > you can tell me which version you prefer?
>
> Actually, no need for rfc v2, can just paste here:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> index d1365acfd1f8c..9759b0186bcc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c
> @@ -119,92 +119,6 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p
> functions, pins, npins);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
> - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
> - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
> - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
> - * adding mappings.
> - */
> -int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> - struct device_node *np,
> - struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> - unsigned int *num_maps)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
> - struct device_node *child_np;
> - const char **group_names;
> - unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0;
> - int ngroups = 0;
> - int ret;
> -
> - *maps = NULL;
> - *num_maps = 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing
> - * multiple pins nodes.
> - */
> - if (!of_property_present(np, "pins"))
> - goto parent;
> -
> - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!group_names)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np,
> - maps, num_maps,
> - &num_reserved_maps,
> - group_names,
> - ngroups);
> - if (ret) {
> - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name);
> - }
> -
> - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -parent:
> - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np)
> - ngroups += 1;
> -
> - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!group_names)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - ngroups = 0;
> - for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
> - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np,
> - maps, num_maps,
> - &num_reserved_maps,
> - group_names,
> - ngroups);
> - if (ret) {
> - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n",
> - np->name);
> - }
> -
> - ngroups++;
> - }
> -
> - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map);
> -
> -
> static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> struct device_node *parent,
> struct device_node *np,
> @@ -250,20 +164,19 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> muxes, pins, npins);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
> - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
> - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
> - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
> - * adding mappings.
> - *
> - * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin
> - * and the lower 16 the mux setting.
> - */
> -int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +static int pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
This function name conflicts with another helper in the pinctrl
core, so I would have to rename it, but that's not needed for proof of
concept of course.
> struct device_node *np,
> struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> - unsigned int *num_maps)
> + unsigned int *num_maps,
> + int (dt_subnode_to_map)(
> + struct pinctrl_dev *,
> + struct device_node *,
> + struct device_node *,
> + struct pinctrl_map **,
> + unsigned int *,
> + unsigned int *,
> + const char **,
> + unsigned int))
> {
> struct device *dev = pctldev->dev;
> struct device_node *child_np;
> @@ -276,21 +189,18 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> *num_maps = 0;
>
> /*
> - * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing
> - * multiple pinmux nodes.
> + * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing
> + * multiple pins nodes.
> */
> - if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux"))
> + if (!of_property_present(np, "pins"))
> goto parent;
>
> group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!group_names)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np,
> - maps, num_maps,
> - &num_reserved_maps,
> - group_names,
> - ngroups);
> + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, maps, num_maps,
> + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups);
> if (ret) {
> pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name);
> @@ -314,11 +224,8 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>
> ngroups = 0;
> for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
> - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np,
> - maps, num_maps,
> - &num_reserved_maps,
> - group_names,
> - ngroups);
> + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, maps, num_maps,
> + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups);
> if (ret) {
> pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps);
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n",
> @@ -336,4 +243,40 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
> + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
> + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
> + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
> + * adding mappings.
> + */
> +int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> + unsigned int *num_maps)
> +{
> + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps,
> + &pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map);
> +
> +/*
> + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but
> + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike
> + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups
> + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and
> + * adding mappings.
> + *
> + * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin
> + * and the lower 16 the mux setting.
> + */
> +int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + struct pinctrl_map **maps,
> + unsigned int *num_maps)
> +{
> + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps,
> + &pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map);
> +};
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map);
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-14 19:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij
2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox