* [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation
@ 2026-05-06 9:57 Conor Dooley
2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Hey Linus,
Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work,
although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very
limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure.
What I don't love though is how similar the functions
pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical
other than which function they in turn call.
Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, or if
you'd rather see something that's totally generic between the two
and figures out which foo_dt_subnode_to_map() function to call*,
or convert pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and
pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() to wrappers that pass a function
pointer of the appropriate foo_dt_subnode_to_map() to a shared node
parsing function, or some third option that I have not considered.
If you try to apply this, it's on top of Frank's mux series. It's also
here if any of the spacemit-ters want to look at what I did to their
driver:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/log/?h=spacemit-pinctrl
None of the patches have real commit messages due to this being RFC :)
Cheers,
Conor.
* pinmux/pins + functions/groups + functions I think are the only
really valid combinations here, so it wouldn't be too difficult to
arrange that logic.
CC: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
CC: Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
CC: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
CC: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
CC: spacemit@lists.linux.dev
Conor Dooley (4):
pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass
void data
pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux
pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power()
pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map
implementation
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 20 +++-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 70 +++----------
3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 6 ++---- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h index 83f2d00c732e1..5d99fef27657f 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h @@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps, const char **group_name, unsigned int ngroups, - const char **functions, unsigned int *pins, - unsigned int npins); + void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins); #else static inline int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, @@ -188,8 +187,7 @@ pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent, struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps, const char **group_name, unsigned int ngroups, - const char **functions, unsigned int *pins, - unsigned int npins) + void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins) { return -ENOTSUPP; } diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c index 76670aef62da4..6a13fd4eea65b 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps, const char **group_names, unsigned int ngroups, - const char **functions, unsigned int *pins, - unsigned int npins) + void *data, unsigned int *pins, unsigned int npins) { struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; unsigned int num_configs; @@ -45,7 +44,7 @@ int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *pare if (ret < 0) return ret; - ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, group_name, pins, npins, functions); + ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, group_name, pins, npins, data); if (ret < 0) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add group %s: %d\n", group_name, ret); -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 14 ++++ drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h index 5d99fef27657f..30c42d81e8829 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.h @@ -167,6 +167,11 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct pinctrl_map **maps, unsigned int *num_maps); +int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps); + int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent, struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, unsigned int *num_maps, unsigned int *num_reserved_maps, @@ -182,6 +187,15 @@ pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return -ENOTSUPP; } +static inline int +pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps) +{ + return -ENOTSUPP; +} + static inline int pinctrl_generic_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent, struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c index 6a13fd4eea65b..69df211f6b964 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c @@ -202,3 +202,137 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map); + + +static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *parent, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps, + unsigned int *num_reserved_maps, + const char **group_names, + unsigned int ngroups) +{ + struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; + unsigned int *pins, *muxes; + int npins, ret; + + npins = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "pinmux"); + + if (npins < 1) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid pinctrl group %pOFn.%pOFn %d\n", + parent, np, npins); + return npins; + } + + pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pins) + return -ENOMEM; + + muxes = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*muxes), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!muxes) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (int i = 0; i < npins; i++) { + unsigned int pinmux; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "pinmux", i, &pinmux); + if (ret) + return ret; + + pins[i] = pinmux >> 16; + muxes[i] = pinmux & GENMASK(15, 0); + } + + return pinctrl_generic_to_map(pctldev, parent, np, maps, num_maps, + num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups, + muxes, pins, npins); +} + +/* + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and + * adding mappings. + * + * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin + * and the lower 16 the mux setting. + */ +int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps) +{ + struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; + struct device_node *child_np; + const char **group_names; + unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0; + int ngroups = 0; + int ret; + + *maps = NULL; + *num_maps = 0; + + /* + * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing + * multiple pinmux nodes. + */ + if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux")) + goto parent; + + group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!group_names) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, + maps, num_maps, + &num_reserved_maps, + group_names, + ngroups); + if (ret) { + pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name); + } + + ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL); + if (ret < 0) { + pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); + } + + return 0; + +parent: + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) + ngroups += 1; + + group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!group_names) + return -ENOMEM; + + ngroups = 0; + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) { + ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, + maps, num_maps, + &num_reserved_maps, + group_names, + ngroups); + if (ret) { + pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", + np->name); + } + + ngroups++; + } + + ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL); + if (ret < 0) { + pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); + } + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map); -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley 2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> AFAICT, this is pointless because generate_config performs this check too. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 37 --------------------------- 1 file changed, 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c index 62cab6f6cd0a8..41d8a34bc386b 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c @@ -409,38 +409,6 @@ static inline u32 spacemit_get_drive_strength_mA(enum spacemit_pin_io_type type, } } -static int spacemit_pctrl_check_power(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, - struct device_node *dn, - struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *pinmuxs, - int num_pins, const char *grpname) -{ - struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); - struct device *dev = pctrl->dev; - enum spacemit_pin_io_type type; - u32 power = 0, i; - - of_property_read_u32(dn, "power-source", &power); - - for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) { - type = spacemit_to_pin_io_type(pinmuxs[i].pin); - - if (type != IO_TYPE_EXTERNAL) - continue; - - switch (power) { - case PIN_POWER_STATE_1V8: - case PIN_POWER_STATE_3V3: - break; - default: - dev_err(dev, "group %s has unsupported power\n", - grpname); - return -ENOTSUPP; - } - } - - return 0; -} - static void spacemit_set_io_pwr_domain(struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl, const struct spacemit_pin *spin, const enum spacemit_pin_io_type type) @@ -548,11 +516,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "failed to get pin %d\n", pins[i]); } - ret = spacemit_pctrl_check_power(pctldev, child, pinmuxs, - npins, grpname); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - map[nmaps].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP; map[nmaps].data.mux.function = np->name; map[nmaps].data.mux.group = grpname; -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-06 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: conor, Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c | 33 ++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c index 41d8a34bc386b..c90b6ccfce2ea 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/spacemit/pinctrl-k1.c @@ -114,11 +114,6 @@ struct spacemit_pinctrl_data { const struct spacemit_pinctrl_dconf *dconf; }; -struct spacemit_pin_mux_config { - const struct spacemit_pin *pin; - u32 config; -}; - /* map pin id to pinctrl register offset, refer MFPR definition */ static unsigned int spacemit_k1_pin_to_offset(unsigned int pin) { @@ -474,7 +469,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, ngroups = 0; guard(mutex)(&pctrl->mutex); for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) { - struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *pinmuxs; unsigned int config, *pins; int i, npins; @@ -497,10 +491,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, if (!pins) return -ENOMEM; - pinmuxs = devm_kcalloc(dev, npins, sizeof(*pinmuxs), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!pinmuxs) - return -ENOMEM; - for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) { ret = of_property_read_u32_index(child, "pinmux", i, &config); @@ -509,11 +499,6 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return -EINVAL; pins[i] = spacemit_dt_get_pin(config); - pinmuxs[i].config = config; - pinmuxs[i].pin = spacemit_get_pin(pctrl, pins[i]); - - if (!pinmuxs[i].pin) - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "failed to get pin %d\n", pins[i]); } map[nmaps].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP; @@ -522,7 +507,7 @@ static int spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, nmaps += 1; ret = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, grpname, - pins, npins, pinmuxs); + pins, npins, &config); if (ret < 0) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add group %s: %d\n", grpname, ret); @@ -559,7 +544,7 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops spacemit_pctrl_ops = { .get_group_name = pinctrl_generic_get_group_name, .get_group_pins = pinctrl_generic_get_group_pins, .pin_dbg_show = spacemit_pctrl_dbg_show, - .dt_node_to_map = spacemit_pctrl_dt_node_to_map, + .dt_node_to_map = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map, .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map, }; @@ -568,8 +553,8 @@ static int spacemit_pmx_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, { struct spacemit_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); const struct group_desc *group; - const struct spacemit_pin_mux_config *configs; unsigned int i, mux; + unsigned int *configs; void __iomem *reg; group = pinctrl_generic_get_group(pctldev, gsel); @@ -579,11 +564,17 @@ static int spacemit_pmx_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, configs = group->data; for (i = 0; i < group->grp.npins; i++) { - const struct spacemit_pin *spin = configs[i].pin; - u32 value = configs[i].config; + const struct spacemit_pin *spin; + u32 value = configs[i]; + + spin = spacemit_get_pin(pctrl, group->grp.pins[i]); + if (!spin) { + dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Invalid pin %u\n", group->grp.pins[i]); + return -EINVAL; + } reg = spacemit_pin_to_reg(pctrl, spin->pin); - mux = spacemit_dt_get_pin_mux(value); + mux = value; guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&pctrl->lock); value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~PAD_MUX; -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-11 20:23 ` Linus Walleij 2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley 4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Linus Walleij @ 2026-05-11 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Conor Dooley Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work, > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure. I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it. > What I don't love though is how similar the functions > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical > other than which function they in turn call. Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive to the first one? I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could perhaps be names something that make it evident what is special about it. Not that I have a good idea. > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin control core work so I'm happy for everything I get. Yours, Linus Walleij ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation 2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij @ 2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1641 bytes --] On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work, > > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very > > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure. > > I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it. Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in the interim. > > What I don't love though is how similar the functions > > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and > > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical > > other than which function they in turn call. > > Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive > to the first one? I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication. > I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what > it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could > perhaps be names something that make it evident what is > special about it. Not that I have a good idea. > > > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, > > Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin > control core work so I'm happy for everything I get. Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and you can tell me which version you prefer? [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation 2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9547 bytes --] On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work, > > > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very > > > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure. > > > > I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it. > > Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look > but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in > the interim. > > > > What I don't love though is how similar the functions > > > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and > > > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical > > > other than which function they in turn call. > > > > Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive > > to the first one? > > I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code > that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication. > > > I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what > > it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could > > perhaps be names something that make it evident what is > > special about it. Not that I have a good idea. > > > > > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, > > > > Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin > > control core work so I'm happy for everything I get. > > Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an > extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and > you can tell me which version you prefer? Actually, no need for rfc v2, can just paste here: diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c index d1365acfd1f8c..9759b0186bcc2 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c @@ -119,92 +119,6 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p functions, pins, npins); } -/* - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and - * adding mappings. - */ -int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, - struct device_node *np, - struct pinctrl_map **maps, - unsigned int *num_maps) -{ - struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; - struct device_node *child_np; - const char **group_names; - unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0; - int ngroups = 0; - int ret; - - *maps = NULL; - *num_maps = 0; - - /* - * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing - * multiple pins nodes. - */ - if (!of_property_present(np, "pins")) - goto parent; - - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!group_names) - return -ENOMEM; - - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, - maps, num_maps, - &num_reserved_maps, - group_names, - ngroups); - if (ret) { - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name); - } - - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL); - if (ret < 0) { - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); - } - - return 0; - -parent: - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) - ngroups += 1; - - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!group_names) - return -ENOMEM; - - ngroups = 0; - for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) { - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, - maps, num_maps, - &num_reserved_maps, - group_names, - ngroups); - if (ret) { - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", - np->name); - } - - ngroups++; - } - - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL); - if (ret < 0) { - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); - } - - return 0; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map); - - static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *parent, struct device_node *np, @@ -250,20 +164,19 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, muxes, pins, npins); } -/* - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and - * adding mappings. - * - * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin - * and the lower 16 the mux setting. - */ -int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, +static int pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct device_node *np, struct pinctrl_map **maps, - unsigned int *num_maps) + unsigned int *num_maps, + int (dt_subnode_to_map)( + struct pinctrl_dev *, + struct device_node *, + struct device_node *, + struct pinctrl_map **, + unsigned int *, + unsigned int *, + const char **, + unsigned int)) { struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; struct device_node *child_np; @@ -276,21 +189,18 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, *num_maps = 0; /* - * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing - * multiple pinmux nodes. + * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing + * multiple pins nodes. */ - if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux")) + if (!of_property_present(np, "pins")) goto parent; group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); if (!group_names) return -ENOMEM; - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, - maps, num_maps, - &num_reserved_maps, - group_names, - ngroups); + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, maps, num_maps, + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups); if (ret) { pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name); @@ -314,11 +224,8 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, ngroups = 0; for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) { - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, - maps, num_maps, - &num_reserved_maps, - group_names, - ngroups); + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, maps, num_maps, + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups); if (ret) { pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", @@ -336,4 +243,40 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return 0; } + +/* + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and + * adding mappings. + */ +int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps) +{ + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps, + &pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map); + +/* + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and + * adding mappings. + * + * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin + * and the lower 16 the mux setting. + */ +int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct device_node *np, + struct pinctrl_map **maps, + unsigned int *num_maps) +{ + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps, + &pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map); +}; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map); [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation 2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Conor Dooley @ 2026-05-14 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: Conor Dooley, Yixun Lan, Troy Mitchell, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-riscv, spacemit [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10281 bytes --] On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 08:40:26PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:58 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Whipped this up last week, at to a first glance it appears to work, > > > > although the spacemit platform I've used to implement this has very > > > > limited in-tree use of pinctrl so it is hard to be sure. > > > > > > I like it, if it wasn't RFC I would merge it. > > > > Half the reason that it is RFC is that I knew dlan wanted to take a look > > but told me they weren't available, so I said I'd send it on the list in > > the interim. > > > > > > What I don't love though is how similar the functions > > > > pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() and > > > > pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map() are - essentially identical > > > > other than which function they in turn call. > > > > > > Hm we can maybe think of something more descriptive > > > to the first one? > > > > I think the name is actually okay, it was the similarity of the code > > that I don't like. There's a fair bit of duplication. > > > > > I think the new function is very much to the point. That's what > > > it does. pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map() could > > > perhaps be names something that make it evident what is > > > special about it. Not that I have a good idea. > > > > > > > Basically, I wanna know if you think that that is acceptable, > > > > > > Looks Good To Me (TM) no-one else is helping out with pin > > > control core work so I'm happy for everything I get. > > > > Right, well I'll go clean it up I suppose. I might send a rfc v2 with an > > extra patch that tries to get rid of some of the code duplication and > > you can tell me which version you prefer? > > Actually, no need for rfc v2, can just paste here: > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c > index d1365acfd1f8c..9759b0186bcc2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-generic.c > @@ -119,92 +119,6 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *p > functions, pins, npins); > } > > -/* > - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but > - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike > - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups > - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and > - * adding mappings. > - */ > -int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > - struct device_node *np, > - struct pinctrl_map **maps, > - unsigned int *num_maps) > -{ > - struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; > - struct device_node *child_np; > - const char **group_names; > - unsigned int num_reserved_maps = 0; > - int ngroups = 0; > - int ret; > - > - *maps = NULL; > - *num_maps = 0; > - > - /* > - * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing > - * multiple pins nodes. > - */ > - if (!of_property_present(np, "pins")) > - goto parent; > - > - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!group_names) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, > - maps, num_maps, > - &num_reserved_maps, > - group_names, > - ngroups); > - if (ret) { > - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name); > - } > - > - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, 1, NULL); > - if (ret < 0) { > - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); > - } > - > - return 0; > - > -parent: > - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) > - ngroups += 1; > - > - group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, ngroups, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!group_names) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - ngroups = 0; > - for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) { > - ret = pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, > - maps, num_maps, > - &num_reserved_maps, > - group_names, > - ngroups); > - if (ret) { > - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", > - np->name); > - } > - > - ngroups++; > - } > - > - ret = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, np->name, group_names, ngroups, NULL); > - if (ret < 0) { > - pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error adding function %s\n", np->name); > - } > - > - return 0; > -} > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map); > - > - > static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct device_node *parent, > struct device_node *np, > @@ -250,20 +164,19 @@ static int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > muxes, pins, npins); > } > > -/* > - * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but > - * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike > - * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups > - * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and > - * adding mappings. > - * > - * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin > - * and the lower 16 the mux setting. > - */ > -int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > +static int pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, This function name conflicts with another helper in the pinctrl core, so I would have to rename it, but that's not needed for proof of concept of course. > struct device_node *np, > struct pinctrl_map **maps, > - unsigned int *num_maps) > + unsigned int *num_maps, > + int (dt_subnode_to_map)( > + struct pinctrl_dev *, > + struct device_node *, > + struct device_node *, > + struct pinctrl_map **, > + unsigned int *, > + unsigned int *, > + const char **, > + unsigned int)) > { > struct device *dev = pctldev->dev; > struct device_node *child_np; > @@ -276,21 +189,18 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > *num_maps = 0; > > /* > - * Check if this is actually the pinmux node, or a parent containing > - * multiple pinmux nodes. > + * Check if this is actually the pins node, or a parent containing > + * multiple pins nodes. > */ > - if (!of_property_present(np, "pinmux")) > + if (!of_property_present(np, "pins")) > goto parent; > > group_names = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*group_names), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!group_names) > return -ENOMEM; > > - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, > - maps, num_maps, > - &num_reserved_maps, > - group_names, > - ngroups); > + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, np, maps, num_maps, > + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups); > if (ret) { > pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", np->name); > @@ -314,11 +224,8 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > ngroups = 0; > for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) { > - ret = pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, > - maps, num_maps, > - &num_reserved_maps, > - group_names, > - ngroups); > + ret = dt_subnode_to_map(pctldev, np, child_np, maps, num_maps, > + &num_reserved_maps, group_names, ngroups); > if (ret) { > pinctrl_utils_free_map(pctldev, *maps, *num_maps); > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "error figuring out mappings for %s\n", > @@ -336,4 +243,40 @@ int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > return 0; > } > + > +/* > + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but > + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike > + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups > + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and > + * adding mappings. > + */ > +int pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + struct device_node *np, > + struct pinctrl_map **maps, > + unsigned int *num_maps) > +{ > + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps, > + &pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_subnode_to_map); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pins_function_dt_node_to_map); > + > +/* > + * For platforms that do not define groups or functions in the driver, but > + * instead use the devicetree to describe them. This function will, unlike > + * pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map() etc which rely on driver defined groups > + * and functions, create them in addition to parsing pinconf properties and > + * adding mappings. > + * > + * It assumes that the upper 16 bits of the pinmux items contain the pin > + * and the lower 16 the mux setting. > + */ > +int pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + struct device_node *np, > + struct pinctrl_map **maps, > + unsigned int *num_maps) > +{ > + return pinctrl_generic_dt_node_to_map(pctldev, np, maps, num_maps, > + &pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_subnode_to_map); > +}; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_pinmux_dt_node_to_map); > [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-14 19:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-05-06 9:57 [RFC v1 0/4] generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 1/4] pinctrl: generic: change signature of pinctrl_generic_to_map() to pass void data Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 2/4] pinctrl: add new generic groups/function creation function for pinmux Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 3/4] pinctrl: spacemit: delete check_power() Conor Dooley 2026-05-06 9:57 ` [RFC v1 4/4] pinctrl: spacemit: move over to generic pinmux dt_node_to_map implementation Conor Dooley 2026-05-11 20:23 ` [RFC v1 0/4] " Linus Walleij 2026-05-14 18:57 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-14 19:40 ` Conor Dooley 2026-05-14 19:42 ` Conor Dooley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox