Re: [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes

[Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org>]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Bernard, f6bvp wrote:

> All seven patch applied.
> However there are compile errors in rose_route.c
> 
> f6bvp-8 linux]# make modules
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CC [M] net/rose/af_rose.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_dev.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_in.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_link.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_loopback.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_out.o
> CC [M] net/rose/rose_route.o
> net/rose/rose_route.c: In function ‘rose_add_node’:
> net/rose/rose_route.c:104: erreur: incompatible type for argument 2
> of ‘atomic_add_return’
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.39/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:173: note:
> expected ‘struct atomic_t *’ but argument is of type ‘atomic_t’
> net/rose/rose_route.c: In function ‘rose_add_loopback_neigh’:
> net/rose/rose_route.c:391: erreur: incompatible type for argument 2
> of ‘atomic_add_return’
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.39/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:173: note:
> expected ‘struct atomic_t *’ but argument is of type ‘atomic_t’
> make[2]: *** [net/rose/rose_route.o] Erreur 1
> make[1]: *** [net/rose] Erreur 2
> make: *** [net] Erreur 2

Odd, the timestamps of my build tree must have been scrambled.  I
get the same error messages but only after a full make clean and the
error is quite obvious.

I'm going to send a replacement match for the defective patch in
a minute.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html