From: f6bvp <f6bvp@free.fr>
To: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:32:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E33351A.2040907@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722105641.GA24477@linux-mips.org>
Le 22/07/2011 12:56, Ralf Baechle DL5RB a écrit :
> Most excellent! Take your time for testing - unfortunately we missed
> the v3.0 train already but it would be great if we could backport these
> fixes to -stable after some more positive testing.
>
> Is the system that was having these issues btw. running a preemptable kernel
> or does it have multiple cores or hyperthreading?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralf
My two ROSE-FPAC nodes have been running for 8 days and 12 hours without
disruption.
Tonight I noticed that "use" parameter was negative (-1) while remote node
station F8COJ-11 was not connected (restart = "no" and tf counting).
Later, F8COJ-11 node got connected again (restart = "yes") and "use" = 1.
Then "use" returned to 0 after a few minutes.
This system is the one with SMP kernel and Voluntary Kernel Preemption
(Desktop).
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 99
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 -1 DTE no 0 87
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 1 DCE yes 0 0
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters
00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0
00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 0 DCE yes 0 0
00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0
00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0
00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0
At the same times, on my second Linux system (with maxcpus=1 boot kernel
parameter),
use was 0 when not connected and it keeps displaying use=1 since ROSE
neighbour F8COJ has been connected again.
However, both nodes are performing well and are able to route ROSE
frames to F8COJ-11.
Bernard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 9:00 [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] NET: ROSE: Factor our common code from functions Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] NET: ROSE: Fix race in SIOCRSSL2CALL ioctl accessing userspace Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 0:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] NET: ROSE: Protect rose_callsign with a spinlock Ralf Baechle
2013-08-06 17:57 ` [PATCH] ax25tools mheard : don't display empty records f6bvp@free
2013-08-07 8:17 ` Thomas Osterried
2013-08-07 10:06 ` f6bvp@free
2013-08-09 8:10 ` Thomas Osterried
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] NET: ROSE: Make neighbour->use atomic Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] NET: ROSE: Make rose_neigh_no atomic Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] NET: ROSE: Move return statements hidden behind an if to their own line Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 8:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] NET: ROSE: Fix formatting Ralf Baechle
2011-07-20 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes Bernard, f6bvp
2011-07-20 17:59 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-22 9:10 ` Bernard, f6bvp
2011-07-22 10:56 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-22 16:12 ` f6bvp
2011-07-23 13:28 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2011-07-29 22:32 ` f6bvp [this message]
2011-08-08 13:40 ` f6bvp
2011-08-08 14:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-08-08 15:33 ` f6bvp
2011-08-19 13:07 ` f6bvp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E33351A.2040907@free.fr \
--to=f6bvp@free.fr \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox