From: Tomi Manninen <oh2bns@sral.fi>
To: ax25@x-berg.in-berlin.de
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ax25-apps/-tools: clarification about the project status
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:29:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497CD9B9.4090500@sral.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090125144334.GA9629@x-berg.in-berlin.de>
Hi all,
I haven't had anything AX.25 related running for several years
now, and I don't feel very strongly about the development.
However, I think I need to comment a few things Thomas said.
Thomas Osterried wrote:
> linux-hams is a mixed mailing-list for all kind of ham related linux
> applications, kernel problems, beginner questions, etc.
>
> And in the special case of issues with libax25, ax25-apps and
> ax25-tools, it's doubtless *one* possible place in the world where
> problems and solutions *may* be discussed.
Right from the start (or at least from very early on) and many many
years after, linux-hams@vger was _the_ place to discuss Linux AX.25.
A separate (invitation only) dev-hams was founded at some point,
mainly to be able to keep people like Alan in the loop. Back
then, linux-hams was a moderately high volume mailing list and
the signal to noise ratio was considerably lower than today.
But still, _this_ was always _the_ list. "Everything" happened here.
> We're sure you understand that it's not possible for us to follow and
> participate in all discussions in all the known and all the unkonwn
> places in cyberspace.
> Btw, if more users whould have acted as informer, we'd have visited
> that place.
That is understood. But why you (seemingly) chose to abandon this
list, I don't quite understand. At least nowadays this is a very
low bandwidth list and I think it was pretty much so at the time
Ralf took over.
I don't know where the discussion happens nowadays (if not here).
Apparently quite a few other people don't know it either, judging
by the messages on this list.
If you choose to set up a new place to discuss, that is of course
just fine. But you can not expect people to just follow. And it
might be just me, but _I_ haven't noticed an announcement saying
that this list has ceased to be The Place, and from now on
discussion is at the mailing list xxx *) at yyy...
> But here's the point where your own responsibility starts: if you find
> a bug, if you have problems compiling or configuring, if you need a
> new feature, if you have traced a problem down, if you luckily have a
> patch, if you like to contribute, then *please* send an e-mail to us,
> the maintainers of the software!
Couldn't agree more. And I too have seen this. At least in the
ham radio world, an open source developer is rather lonely.
For example with LinuxNode, I knew there were several spin-offs
out there, but _none_ of the spin-off developers ever contacted me.
But again I have to say, from the point of view of someone that
is not all that interested in the stuff anymore, and _only_
follows this mailing list, you gyus have kept quite a low profile...
> We really cannot understand,
And that is why I wrote this.
I have nothing but the greatest respect of what you are doing.
It is good to see that things are not dead and I just hope
that some of the stuff I have done in the past is helpful
in what you do now.
So please take this email as constructive critisism and a
possible explanation for the things you see. I don't know
why other people have not contacted you, but I must say
that if I were to activate myself and do some development
work for Linux AX.25, _this_ would be the place I would send
patches for review. I might remember to CC Ralf, but not
necessarily. Sorry.
73, Tomi
*) Like I said, I don't feel very strongly about linux ax.25
anymore, but I do feel _very_ strongly about using wikis and
web forums for discussion on open source software. It sucks!
I just hope that isn't happening here...
--
Tomi Manninen / OH2BNS / KP20JE01FK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-25 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 14:43 ax25-apps/-tools: clarification about the project status Thomas Osterried
2009-01-25 21:29 ` Tomi Manninen [this message]
2009-01-25 22:11 ` Ken Koster
2009-01-25 23:43 ` Tomi Manninen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-26 17:31 IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497CD9B9.4090500@sral.fi \
--to=oh2bns@sral.fi \
--cc=ax25@x-berg.in-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox