Linux HAM/Amateur Radio development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Smith <dsmith@danplanet.com>
To: Patrick Ouellette <pouelle@debian.org>
Cc: Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@gmail.com>, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AX25 and related software's future in Debian
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 12:01:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA42797.2020406@danplanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504184934.GE6444@flying-gecko.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1972 bytes --]

> There is not any particularly novel or new thing that you can do
> with Node.js that can't be done with another toolkit as far as I
> can tell.

Sure, but certainly you would not argue that someone shouldn't use the
toolkit of their choice because their distro couldn't or didn't decide
how they should coexist, right? :)

> Actually http is not the problem so much as the plethora of poorly
> written and implemented web sites and all the web 2.0 "interactive"
> user experience with mouse overs that send data back to the server
> automatically, triggering the server to send a response.
> 
> Don't misunderstand me, I like the flashy Ajax web2.0 user experiences
> I get on my 25Mbps/25Mbps FiOS internet connection - I'm just really
> skeptical it will be as nice at 9600 baud or slower on an ax25 network.

Whether it makes sense over a slow RF connection or whether people tend
to use it to write crap is really neither here nor there, IMHO. What if
I wanted to write something that provided a web (or web services)
interface to my AX.25 network? I wanted to put that box on the border
between my tens-of-megabits internet connection and my 9600 baud AX.25
network of course, so that new-to-amateur radio kids could poke at the
network with a web browser. I'm not using Node.js for the AX.25 side,
but for the public-facing one. If the resolution here is to make the two
mutually exclusive, then that becomes harder.

Now, I'm certainly not arguing that one should have to take the rename
penalty over the other mind you, I'm just saying I think making them
mutually exclusive to solve the problem is precisely the sort of thing
the guidelines are trying to avoid using Conflicts: for. I'd tend to
lean towards a "we were here first" state of mind, but I also don't want
to find out that debian said "fine, screw you _and_ your eighteen
friends" when I got my head out of the sand :)

-- 
Dan Smith
www.danplanet.com
KK7DS


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04  1:32 AX25 and related software's future in Debian Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04  1:46 ` Dave Platt
2012-05-04  2:10   ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04  1:53 ` Kamal Mostafa
2012-05-04  2:03 ` Charles Suprin
2012-05-04  2:17   ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04  2:20 ` Alejandro Santos
2012-05-04  5:20   ` Kim, VK5FJ
2012-05-04 14:34     ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 14:06 ` Dan Smith
2012-05-04 15:14   ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 15:35     ` Dan Smith
2012-05-04 16:28     ` Steve Kostecke
2012-05-04 16:57       ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 17:50         ` Bill Vodall
2012-05-04 18:06           ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 18:32             ` Dan Smith
2012-05-04 18:49               ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 19:01                 ` Dan Smith [this message]
2012-05-04 19:31                   ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04 22:52     ` Damien Gardner Jnr
     [not found] ` <CAPSBm51zYFpfPa0Rqvjemv4KGh-NQfFmFTcW07B8KzpTK_E8bw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-05  3:00   ` Kris Kirby
2012-05-05 13:33 ` Thomas Osterried
2012-05-23 18:15 ` Wesley J. Landaker
2012-05-23 20:38   ` Nate Bargmann
2012-05-23 22:48   ` Damien Gardner Jnr
2012-05-24 12:18   ` C.J. Adams-Collier
2012-05-24 12:33     ` IT1 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR
2012-05-24 23:05       ` Marius Petrescu
2012-05-24 23:29         ` IT1 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR
2012-05-25  0:02           ` Marius Petrescu
2012-05-25  0:04             ` Marius Petrescu
2012-05-25  0:56               ` Bob Nielsen
2012-05-25  1:46                 ` Nate Bargmann
     [not found] <S1754044Ab2EQTsl/20120517194841Z+66@vger.kernel.org>
2012-05-17 20:03 ` Charles Boling (AD7UF)
2012-05-17 20:25   ` John Goerzen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA42797.2020406@danplanet.com \
    --to=dsmith@danplanet.com \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pouelle@debian.org \
    --cc=wa7nwp@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox