Linux Hardware Monitor development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Akhil R" <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] i3c: master: Use unified device property interface
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:08:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423200835.5A10FC2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423085718.70762-4-akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>

Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s):
- [Critical] Dangling fwnode pointer in boardinfo leading to Use-After-Free on device hot-plug.
- [High] Master registration fails on ACPI systems due to mandatory OF-specific property checks.
--

commit bc7c2a6c59d2e2a9a674fb4e8a851cbc8852b1e2
Author: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>

i3c: master: Use unified device property interface

This commit replaces OF-specific functions with unified device property
functions to serve as a prerequisite for supporting both ACPI and device
tree.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 5cd4e5da22333..d0677061faab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -993,7 +995,7 @@ static void i3c_device_release(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	WARN_ON(i3cdev->desc);
>  
> -	of_node_put(i3cdev->dev.of_node);
> +	fwnode_handle_put(dev->fwnode);
>  	kfree(i3cdev);
>  }
>  
[ ... ]
> @@ -1789,7 +1791,7 @@ i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
>  			     desc->info.pid);
>  
>  		if (desc->boardinfo)
> -			desc->dev->dev.of_node = desc->boardinfo->of_node;
> +			device_set_node(&desc->dev->dev, desc->boardinfo->fwnode);

Can this result in a use-after-free if a device is hot-unplugged and later
re-registered?

Since device_set_node() does not increment the fwnode reference count, the
device shares the reference owned by boardinfo.

During device unregistration, i3c_device_release() unconditionally calls
fwnode_handle_put(dev->fwnode), dropping that single reference.

If the device is subsequently hot-plugged, will the cached boardinfo reuse
the now-freed fwnode pointer? Would it be safer to acquire a new reference
when setting the device node, like fwnode_handle_get(desc->boardinfo->fwnode)?

[ ... ]
> @@ -2499,7 +2505,7 @@ static int of_i3c_master_add_dev(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  	if (!master)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "reg", reg, ARRAY_SIZE(reg));
> +	ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode, "reg", reg, ARRAY_SIZE(reg));
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Does this cause master registration to fail on ACPI systems?

Previously, of_populate_i3c_bus() safely ignored ACPI systems because
dev->of_node was NULL. Now, fwnode_populate_i3c_bus() retrieves the ACPI
fwnode and iterates through its child devices.

For each child, this unconditionally attempts to read the OF-specific reg
property. Since ACPI defines resources via _CRS and _ADR rather than a
reg array, this read will fail and return an error.

This error then propagates up and aborts the entire i3c_master_register()
process. I noticed this regression is fixed later in the patch series by
commit e979566482d52 (i3c: master: Support ACPI enumeration of child
devices), but I am pointing it out here as it temporarily breaks
bisectability for ACPI platforms.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260423085718.70762-1-akhilrajeev@nvidia.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23  8:56 [PATCH v3 00/13] Support ACPI and SETAASA device discovery Akhil R
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] dt-bindings: i3c: Add mipi-i3c-static-method to support SETAASA Akhil R
2026-04-23 11:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-05 21:32     ` Rob Herring
2026-05-05 22:17       ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-05 23:12         ` Rob Herring
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] ACPICA: Read LVR from the I2C resource descriptor Akhil R
2026-04-23 19:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] i3c: master: Use unified device property interface Akhil R
2026-04-23 20:08   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] i3c: master: Support ACPI enumeration of child devices Akhil R
2026-04-23 22:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] i3c: master: Add support for devices using SETAASA Akhil R
2026-04-23 22:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] i3c: master: Add support for devices without PID Akhil R
2026-04-23 23:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] i3c: master: match I3C device through DT and ACPI Akhil R
2026-04-23 23:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] i3c: dw-i3c-master: Add SETAASA as supported CCC Akhil R
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] i3c: dw-i3c-master: Add a quirk to skip clock and reset Akhil R
2026-04-24  0:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] i3c: dw-i3c-master: Add ACPI ID for Tegra410 Akhil R
2026-04-24  0:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] hwmon: spd5118: Remove 16-bit addressing Akhil R
2026-04-24  1:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] hwmon: spd5118: Add I3C support Akhil R
2026-04-24  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23  8:57 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable I3C and SPD5118 hwmon Akhil R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260423200835.5A10FC2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akhilrajeev@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox