From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@weissschuh.net>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Sung-Chi Li <lschyi@chromium.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hwmon: (cros_ec) Add set and get target fan RPM function
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45d0681d-3446-409c-8d9b-0309dbb93ff8@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42c49b0b-cef0-49ca-a5b2-5bb05eae8dec@roeck-us.net>
On 2025-03-22 09:10:40-0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/22/25 08:23, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-03-22 07:12:48-0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 3/22/25 06:55, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > On 2025-03-18 15:45:23+0800, Sung-Chi Li wrote:
> > > > > The ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports closed loop fan speed
> > > > > control, so add the fan target attribute under hwmon framework, such
> > > > > that kernel can expose reading and specifying the desired fan RPM for
> > > > > fans connected to the EC.
> > > > >
> > > > > When probing the cros_ec hwmon module, we also check the supported
> > > > > command version of setting target fan RPM. This commit implements the
> > > > > version 0 of getting the target fan RPM, which can only read the target
> > > > > RPM of the first fan. This commit also implements the version 1 of
> > > > > setting the target fan RPM to each fan respectively.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sung-Chi Li <lschyi@chromium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports closed-loop fan control. We
> > > > > anticipate to have the fan related control from the kernel side, so this
> > > > > series register the HWMON_F_TARGET attribute, and implement the read and
> > > > > write function for setting/reading the target fan RPM from the EC side.
> > > >
> > > > Should it be possible to switch back to automatic control?
> > > > I can't find anything in the hwmon ABI about it.
> > > > And neither in the CrOS EC source.
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not sure I understand the context, but the fan control method is normally
> > > selected with pwmX_enable, which is defined as
> > >
> > > Fan speed control method:
> > >
> > > - 0: no fan speed control (i.e. fan at full speed)
> > > - 1: manual fan speed control enabled (using `pwmY`)
> > > - 2+: automatic fan speed control enabled
> >
> > So far I associated pwmY_enable = 1 with the pwmY attribute.
> > Also controlling it through fanY_target does make sense though.
> > It could be clearer from the docs IMHO.
> >
> > That also means that the patch under discussion needs to implement the
> > pwmY_enable attribute.
> >
>
> Does it ? Does setting the target fan speed automatically change the fan
> control method ? Normally that is orthogonal: One does not necessarily
> want to enable a specific fan control method after setting a single related
> attribute, but do that only after all attributes have been set.
With the currently proposed patch setting fanY_target automatically
switches to manual control. And then there is no way to go back to
automatic control.
> For example, there could be another attribute specifying how fast the fan
> speed should be adjusted, or there could be minimum and/or maximum permitted
> pwm values. I am not saying that this is the case here, but setting a target
> fan speed should not automatically change the fan control method.
Makes sense.
This goes back to my original question: If pwmY_enable is *not*
implemented, how would it be possible to switch between the different
mechanisms?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-23 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 7:45 [PATCH v3] hwmon: (cros_ec) Add set and get target fan RPM function Sung-Chi Li
2025-03-22 13:55 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-22 14:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-22 15:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-22 15:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-23 16:08 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-22 16:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-23 16:05 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-03-23 16:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-25 7:16 ` Sung-Chi Li
2025-03-25 12:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-26 2:44 ` Sung-Chi Li
2025-03-22 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-03-23 16:16 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45d0681d-3446-409c-8d9b-0309dbb93ff8@t-8ch.de \
--to=thomas@weissschuh.net \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lschyi@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox