Re: [PATCH v3] hwmon: (cros_ec) Add set and get target fan RPM function

["Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@weissschuh.net>]

On 2025-03-22 07:12:48-0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/22/25 06:55, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-03-18 15:45:23+0800, Sung-Chi Li wrote:
> > > The ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports closed loop fan speed
> > > control, so add the fan target attribute under hwmon framework, such
> > > that kernel can expose reading and specifying the desired fan RPM for
> > > fans connected to the EC.
> > > 
> > > When probing the cros_ec hwmon module, we also check the supported
> > > command version of setting target fan RPM. This commit implements the
> > > version 0 of getting the target fan RPM, which can only read the target
> > > RPM of the first fan. This commit also implements the version 1 of
> > > setting the target fan RPM to each fan respectively.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sung-Chi Li <lschyi@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > > ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports closed-loop fan control. We
> > > anticipate to have the fan related control from the kernel side, so this
> > > series register the HWMON_F_TARGET attribute, and implement the read and
> > > write function for setting/reading the target fan RPM from the EC side.
> > 
> > Should it be possible to switch back to automatic control?
> > I can't find anything in the hwmon ABI about it.
> > And neither in the CrOS EC source.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> > 
> 
> Not sure I understand the context, but the fan control method is normally
> selected with pwmX_enable, which is defined as
> 
>                 Fan speed control method:
> 
>                 - 0: no fan speed control (i.e. fan at full speed)
>                 - 1: manual fan speed control enabled (using `pwmY`)
>                 - 2+: automatic fan speed control enabled

So far I associated pwmY_enable = 1 with the pwmY attribute.
Also controlling it through fanY_target does make sense though.
It could be clearer from the docs IMHO.

That also means that the patch under discussion needs to implement the
pwmY_enable attribute.

One more thing I have wondered about before:
Is pwmY always refering to the same thing as the matching fanY?


Thanks,
Thomas