Linux Hardware Monitor development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Javier Carrasco" <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:01:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171645@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-chipcap2_locks-v3-2-27ebfc2c5b9e@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] hwmon: chipcap2: premature timeout due to 1-jiffy wait_for_completion_timeout
--

commit 529f4f489744495e9cdde8072b4894cc25895048
Author: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>

hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop

i == CC2_CM_RETRIES can never be true inside the loop, since it
only runs while i < CC2_CM_RETRIES. Use CC2_CM_RETRIES - 1 so the
last failed retry breaks out immediately instead of doing a useless
disable + 80 ms power-cycle delay before the loop condition ends it
anyway.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> index 8550578928523..8102b6851d3d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int cc2_command_mode_start(struct cc2_data *data)
>  				     2 * CC2_RESP_START_CM_US);
>  		}
>  		ret = cc2_read_command_status(data->client);
> -		if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT || i == CC2_CM_RETRIES)
> +		if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT || i == CC2_CM_RETRIES - 1)

[Severity: High]
Can this still cause premature timeouts during device initialization and reads?

Looking at cc2_command_mode_start() just above this check, the timeout
calculation evaluates to exactly 1 jiffy on standard HZ configurations
(e.g., HZ=100 or HZ=250), because 200 microseconds is significantly less
than one tick:

	timeout = usecs_to_jiffies(2 * CC2_RESP_START_CM_US);
	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->complete, timeout);

When a 1-jiffy timeout is passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), it can
expire almost instantly if the next timer interrupt occurs immediately after
the call.

This can cause the driver to prematurely abort the device initialization
without triggering a retry, returning -ETIMEDOUT sporadically. This leads
to random failures in device communication and user-space reads even if
the device properly signals completion within its 100-microsecond window.

This same 1-jiffy timeout issue also affects the EEPROM read sequence in
cc2_read_reg():

	timeout = usecs_to_jiffies(2 * CC2_RESP_EEPROM_R_US);
	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->complete, timeout);

>  			break;
>  
>  		/* command window missed, prepare for a retry */

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014-chipcap2_locks-v3-0-27ebfc2c5b9e@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 17:33 [PATCH v3 00/11] hwmon: chipcap2: various bug fixes Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix command error diagnostics Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 20:11     ` Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix be16 handling Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] hwmon: chipcap2: defer probe when IRQs are unavailable Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix IRQ teardown ordering Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] hwmon: chipcap2: disable device after hwmon teardown Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] hwmon: chipcap2: enable IRQ processing when regulator is already enabled Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] hwmon: chipcap2: balance regulator state Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] hwmon: chipcap2: do not discard pending alarms on disable Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] hwmon: chipcap2: serialize access to the alarm indicators Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] hwmon: chipcap2: synchronize ready IRQ state Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:41   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171645@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox