public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:25:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)

>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:11:51 +0200, Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch> said:

  Andreas> Hi, We have a rx4640 with 3x 3Ware 9500 SATA controllers
  Andreas> and 24x WD740GD HDD in a software RAID0 configuration
  Andreas> (using md).  With kernel 2.6.11 the read performance on the
  Andreas> md is reduced by a factor of 20 (!!)  compared to previous
  Andreas> kernels.  The write rate to the md doesn't change!! (it
  Andreas> actually improves a bit).

Is there any reason to believe this change in behavior is
ia64-specific?  I doubt it.  The q-syscollect profiles on your
web-site shows that the CPU is basically completely idle.  You may
want to try 2.6.10 to see whether the bad behavior was introduced
before or after that.  Unfortunately, 2.6 is developing very rapidly
so you may have to do more binary searching between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10
or 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 to pin the problem down to a useful granularity.
You may also want to look at the bitkeeper changelogs to see if you
can find anything suspicious (you can do that easily via the web by
browsing the source code [1]).  Lastly, you may want to ask on
linux-kernel whether anybody can think of a change that could have
this effect.

	--david

[1] http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/src?nav=index.html

             reply	other threads:[~2005-04-05 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 20:25 David Mosberger [this message]
2005-04-05 20:43 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Rob Fowler
2005-04-06  2:13 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  4:45 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-06  4:53 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  5:10 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  5:56 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06  7:29 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:30 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:32 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  7:34 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  8:33 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 16:58 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 18:57 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 21:50 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox