public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:32:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16979.37026.139746.102031@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com>

>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:29:59 +0200, Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch> said:

  Andreas> Because of this strange correlation between block size and
  Andreas> page size and the fact, that I don't see a problem on x86 I
  Andreas> suspected an ia64-specific problem. My "favourite"
  Andreas> candidate is the conversion to 4 level pagetables between
  Andreas> 2.6.10-bk6 and 2.6.10-bk7.

That's certainly a possibility.  But didn't you say the problem also
occurred when using 4KB page size on ia64?

	--david

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 20:25 [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-05 20:43 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Rob Fowler
2005-04-06  2:13 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  4:45 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-06  4:53 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  5:10 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  5:56 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06  7:29 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:30 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:32 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2005-04-06  7:34 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  8:33 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 16:58 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 18:57 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 21:50 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16979.37026.139746.102031@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox