From: Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:57:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42543123.3080905@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com>
David Mosberger wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:33:07 +0200, Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> Andreas> But the driver in questions is 3w-9xxx and there have been
> Andreas> no chances at all in this driver between 2.6.10 and
> Andreas> 2.6.12-rc1. The changed driver in -rc2 still has the
> Andreas> problem. And I've tried the driver built-in and as a
> Andreas> module (default)...
>
>Are you sure the problem is due to the driver and not RAID0? What if
>you dd directly from the underlying device?
>
>
>
To make sure it's not the md/raid I just took the driver/md directory
from 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 and used it in 2.6.11 => no change in behaviour ...
(The changes in md.c are minor and there are no changes in raid0.c
between .10 and .11 anyway)
As I say on the webpage, a dd on the underlying devices works fine...
It might still be a higher level interface to the md, that's wrong.
And I'm not saying that it's the 3w-9xx driver!! It hasn't changed
between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11, so pretty much impossible to introduce bugs
there...
(It was just mentioned wrt to the fusion-mpt driver.)
Andreas
> --david
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 20:25 [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-05 20:43 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Rob Fowler
2005-04-06 2:13 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06 4:45 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-06 4:53 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06 5:10 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 5:56 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06 7:29 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 7:30 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 7:32 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 7:34 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 8:33 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 16:58 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 18:57 ` Andreas Hirstius [this message]
2005-04-06 21:50 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42543123.3080905@cern.ch \
--to=andreas.hirstius@cern.ch \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox