public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:57:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42543123.3080905@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16978.62532.841151.100745@napali.hpl.hp.com>



David Mosberger wrote:

>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:33:07 +0200, Andreas Hirstius <Andreas.Hirstius@cern.ch> said:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>  Andreas> But the driver in questions is 3w-9xxx and there have been
>  Andreas> no chances at all in this driver between 2.6.10 and
>  Andreas> 2.6.12-rc1. The changed driver in -rc2 still has the
>  Andreas> problem.  And I've tried the driver built-in and as a
>  Andreas> module (default)...
>
>Are you sure the problem is due to the driver and not RAID0?  What if
>you dd directly from the underlying device?
>
>  
>
To make sure it's not the md/raid I just took the driver/md directory 
from 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 and used it in 2.6.11 => no change in behaviour ...
(The changes in md.c are minor and there are no changes in raid0.c 
between .10 and .11 anyway)

As I say on the webpage, a dd on the underlying devices works fine...

It might still be a higher level interface to the md, that's wrong.

And I'm not saying that it's the 3w-9xx driver!! It hasn't changed 
between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11, so pretty much impossible to introduce bugs 
there...
(It was just mentioned wrt to the fusion-mpt driver.)

Andreas

>	--david
>
>  
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 20:25 [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-05 20:43 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Rob Fowler
2005-04-06  2:13 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  4:45 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with David Mosberger
2005-04-06  4:53 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.11 Duraid Madina
2005-04-06  5:10 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  5:56 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06  7:29 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:30 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  7:32 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06  7:34 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06  8:33 ` Andreas Hirstius
2005-04-06 16:58 ` David Mosberger
2005-04-06 18:57 ` Andreas Hirstius [this message]
2005-04-06 21:50 ` [Gelato-technical] Serious performance degradation on a RAID withkernel 2.6.11 Chen, Kenneth W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42543123.3080905@cern.ch \
    --to=andreas.hirstius@cern.ch \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox