From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
davidm@hpl.hp.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serious performance regression due to NX patch
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:19:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040711121950.GU5889@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040711030225.11fb61e7.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:02:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Apropos of nothing much, CONFIG_X86 would be preferreed here, but x86_64
> defines that too.
IMO, x86-64 should stop defining CONFIG_X86. It's far more common
to say "X86 && !X86_64" than it is to say X86. How about defining
CONFIG_X86_COMMON and migrating usage of X86 to X86_COMMON?
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-11 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-10 5:28 serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-11 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 10:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2004-07-11 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-11 12:38 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-07-12 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 18:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-12 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 19:10 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 19:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 20:08 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 20:21 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:24 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 4:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-13 5:23 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 16:05 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-07-13 16:49 ` Daniel McNeil
2004-07-14 18:36 ` [PATCH] mmap PROT_NONE fix (was Re: serious performance regression Daniel McNeil
2004-07-17 0:06 ` serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-17 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-17 4:37 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 3:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-17 0:35 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040711121950.GU5889@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox