From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serious performance regression due to NX patch
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:08:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121402160.2451@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040711123803.GD21264@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > --- linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c.orig3
> > +++ linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > @@ -627,8 +627,14 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
> > executable_stack = EXSTACK_DISABLE_X;
> > break;
> > }
> > +#ifdef __i386_
> > + /*
> > + * Legacy x86 binaries have an expectation of executability for
> > + * virtually all their address-space - turn executability on:
> > + */
> > if (i = elf_ex.e_phnum)
> > def_flags |= VM_EXEC | VM_MAYEXEC;
> > +#endif
>
> This looks incorrect. There are many arches where legacy binaries expect
> the executability for virtually all their address-space (my guess is all
> but x86-64 and ia64), and even on those two legacy binaries expected at
> least stack executable.
so ... this should be #ifndef ia64?
to all the purists: this cannot be done via VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS, because
some architectures enforce the X bit, some dont. In fact only ia64 seems
to enforce it reliably for all binaries.
the #ifdef could be made an arch inline or define. But it's really
academic as only ia64 seems to have this problem. So i'd suggest the patch
below.
Ingo
--- linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c.orig
+++ linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -627,8 +627,14 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
executable_stack = EXSTACK_DISABLE_X;
break;
}
+#ifndef __ia64__
+ /*
+ * Legacy binaries (except ia64) have an expectation of executability
+ * for virtually all their address-space - turn executability on:
+ */
if (i = elf_ex.e_phnum)
def_flags |= VM_EXEC | VM_MAYEXEC;
+#endif
/* Some simple consistency checks for the interpreter */
if (elf_interpreter) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-10 5:28 serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-11 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 10:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-11 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-11 12:38 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-07-12 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-07-12 18:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-12 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 19:10 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 19:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 20:08 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 20:21 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:24 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 4:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-13 5:23 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 16:05 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-07-13 16:49 ` Daniel McNeil
2004-07-14 18:36 ` [PATCH] mmap PROT_NONE fix (was Re: serious performance regression Daniel McNeil
2004-07-17 0:06 ` serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-17 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-17 4:37 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 3:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-17 0:35 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121402160.2451@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox