From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
davidm@hpl.hp.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serious performance regression due to NX patch
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:29:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121428270.22224@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040712182431.GB28281@infradead.org>
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:08:11PM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > the #ifdef could be made an arch inline or define. But it's really
> > academic as only ia64 seems to have this problem. So i'd suggest the patch
> > below.
>
> Well, it's not. We probably want each new port start to have the ia64
> behaviour, so it should be abstracted out nicer.
is it an issue? Each new port will have PT_GNU_STACK, unless they base
themselves on old compilers.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-10 5:28 serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-11 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 10:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-11 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-11 12:38 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-07-12 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 18:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-12 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-07-12 19:10 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 19:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 20:08 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 20:21 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:24 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 4:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-13 5:23 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 16:05 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-07-13 16:49 ` Daniel McNeil
2004-07-14 18:36 ` [PATCH] mmap PROT_NONE fix (was Re: serious performance regression Daniel McNeil
2004-07-17 0:06 ` serious performance regression due to NX patch David Mosberger
2004-07-17 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-17 4:37 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 3:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-17 0:35 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121428270.22224@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox