public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PMU and timer interrupts
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:10:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060209191022.GA4761@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060209171648.GA26865@frankl.hpl.hp.com>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:39:49AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Tony, Jack,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:20:18AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >It was recently pointed out to me that the PMU interrupt
> > >vector is set to 0xee just below the timer interrupt at 0xef.
> > >As such, the timer interrupt has higher priority than the PMU
> > >interrupt. This would make sense except that a side effect is
> > >that it is not possible to collect samples from within the timer
> > >interrupt, i.e. we have a blind spot. Another side effect is
> > >that events happening during the timer handler, may be falsely
> > >attributed to the point where we write the EOI register.
> > >
> > >I looked at the timer_interrupt() path, and I did not see anything special
> > >that would prevent us from swapping the interrupt vectors thereby removing
> > >the blind spot we have.
> > >
> > >Does anybody see a problem with this?
> > 
> > How much would this help?  Both 0xEF and 0xEE are part of the
> > same priority class (see table 5-8 on p. 2-112 of SDM).
> > 
> Correct me if I am wrong, but the class masking happens only with TPR
> masking. So if we had timer=0xee, PMU=0xef and if the kernel does not
> raise the TPR class masking to the priority class of 0xef/0xee, then
> we could still get a PMU interrupt while executing the timer handler.
> 

What you say is true. However, the kernel does use the TPR to enforce 
priority classes:

	void
	ia64_handle_irq (ia64_vector vector, struct pt_regs *regs)
	{
		...
		saved_tpr = ia64_getreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR);
		while (vector != IA64_SPURIOUS_INT_VECTOR) {
			if (!IS_RESCHEDULE(vector)) {
				ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR, vector);
				__do_IRQ(local_vector_to_irq(vector), regs);
		....
	}

Use of priority classes prevents excessive recursion. Without it, as a worse case,
	- a priority 16 interrupt could be interrupted by a priority 17
	- which is interrupted by an 18
	- which is interrupted by an 19
	- which is interrupted by an 20
	- etc. and the kernel stack goes BOOM   :-)

Priority classes limits the recursion to 15 levels at most. 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-09 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-09 17:16 PMU and timer interrupts Stephane Eranian
2006-02-09 18:16 ` Jack Steiner
2006-02-09 18:20 ` Luck, Tony
2006-02-09 18:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-09 19:10 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2006-02-09 19:11 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-10 13:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-10 13:54 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-10 20:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-10 21:22 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-10 23:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-10 23:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-10 23:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-13 10:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-13 10:53 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-13 20:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-13 20:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-02-13 20:13 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-13 20:32 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-13 21:26 ` Keith Owens
2006-02-13 22:49 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-13 23:46 ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060209191022.GA4761@sgi.com \
    --to=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox