From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] kdump: use is_kdump_kernel() in sba_init()
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:40:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729224039.GE6370@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729145156.GO25975@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:51:56AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:12:36PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > After recent patches* is_kdump_kernel() should return 1 in the
> > case where code is executing in a crashkernel and 0 otherwise.
> > It is save to use outside of CONFIG_KDUMP.
> >
> > * http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/28/445
> >
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> is_kdump_kernel() returns 1 when both the following conditions are true.
>
> - CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is enabled
> - And kernel is booting after a panic.
>
> If any of the above condition is not true, it returns 0.
>
> So for the cases where, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=n and kernel is booting after
> panic, is_kdump_kernel() will still return 0.
>
> This essentially means that any kernel which is booting after a panic,
> but does not have CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP enabled, will not take special actions
> required for booting that kernel. Until, somebody can come up with another
> usage of booting a kernel after a panic (apart from crash dump), I think
> this is good enough an assumption.
>
> So your changes will work. I just wanted to clarify the semantics more
> explicitly.
Hi Vivek,
sorry if my explanation was confused. The scheme that you describe
above is what I am working with too.
--
Horms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080729081235.293361145@vergenet.net>
2008-07-29 8:12 ` [patch 1/3] kdump: use is_kdump_kernel() in sba_init() Simon Horman
2008-07-29 14:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-07-29 22:40 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2008-07-29 23:15 ` Simon Horman
2008-07-30 12:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-07-29 8:12 ` [patch 2/3] kdump: add is_vmcore_usable() and vmcore_unusable() Simon Horman
2008-07-29 15:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-07-29 22:39 ` Simon Horman
2008-07-29 23:16 ` Simon Horman
2008-07-29 8:12 ` [patch 3/3] kdump: use is_vmcore_usable() and vmcore_unusable() in reserve_elfcorehdr() Simon Horman
2008-07-30 13:01 ` [patch 3/3] kdump: use is_vmcore_usable() and Vivek Goyal
2008-07-31 0:48 ` Simon Horman
2008-07-31 13:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-01 4:08 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-05 7:19 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080729224039.GE6370@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox