public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Altmaier <richa@engr.sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:00:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005337@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005303@msgid-missing>

Just a comment in principle, historically in the MIPS compiler we have faced
this trouble.   That is, a conflict between the compiler goal of really good
optimization, and the debugger goal of "mapping runtime object code to
something understood by the source code programmer".
The keener you get on optimizations, the more impossible, and finally
simply impossible, is the debuggers job.   We should appreciate that
we are asking for a stretch from both the optimizer AND the debugger!

When no mapping is possible, do we give up the optimization or the
debugging?   Since the person trying to debug is usually the person
who typed "gcc", they can choose.   One effect is for developers to back
off on optimization levels, except for critical functions.   We see this quite
a lot from our ISVs.   Debug time costs more in "opportunity cost", than
the value of attaining the most optimized code performance.

Thanks, Rich




  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-03-22 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-20  2:10 [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn Keith Owens
2001-03-21  0:24 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21  6:03 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  6:53 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21  7:12 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21  7:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21  8:54 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21 17:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 18:48 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:07 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:13 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 19:13 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:26 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:40 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 20:00 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 20:38 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 22:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 23:42 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-22 17:00 ` Rich Altmaier [this message]
2001-03-23 20:28 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-24  0:58 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-24  1:27 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-24  1:37 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-26 22:06 ` DE-DINECHIN,CHRISTOPHE (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
2001-03-26 22:58 ` Cary Coutant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005337@msgid-missing \
    --to=richa@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox