From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:27:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005349@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005303@msgid-missing>
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:58:59 -0800,
Cary Coutant <cary@cup.hp.com> wrote:
>Except for calls to noreturn procedures (which I failed to anticipate in
>the design and specification of the unwind architecture), the return
>point must always be in the same unwind region as the call, because
>nothing can happen to change the unwind state between the call and the
>return point.
Just to make it explicit. Will the runtime architecture be updated to
forbid a call as the last instruction in an unwind region? Or do we
have to somehow cope with this corner case?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-24 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-20 2:10 [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn Keith Owens
2001-03-21 0:24 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 6:03 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21 6:53 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 7:12 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 7:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 8:54 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21 17:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 18:48 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:07 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:13 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 19:13 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:26 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:40 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 20:00 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 20:38 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 22:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 23:42 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-22 17:00 ` Rich Altmaier
2001-03-23 20:28 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-24 0:58 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-24 1:27 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2001-03-24 1:37 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-26 22:06 ` DE-DINECHIN,CHRISTOPHE (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
2001-03-26 22:58 ` Cary Coutant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005349@msgid-missing \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox