public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cary Coutant <cary@cup.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:58:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005353@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005303@msgid-missing>

>Just to make it explicit.  Will the runtime architecture be updated to
>forbid a call as the last instruction in an unwind region?  Or do we
>have to somehow cope with this corner case?

I have made the following proposal, in the IA-64 psABI group, to amend 
the runtime document:

>... I propose adding the following rule to Section 8.7, 
>"Requirements for unwinding the stack," in the Software Conventions and 
>Runtime Architecture document:
>
>* The return BR must contain an address that can be used to
>  determine the unwind state of the calling procedure. For
>  example, a compiler may choose to optimize calls to
>  procedures that do not return. If it does so, however, it must
>  ensure that the unwind information for the procedure properly
>  describes the unwind state at the return point, even though the
>  return point will never be executed. This may require the
>  insertion of an otherwise unnecessary nop or break instruction.

-cary


      parent reply	other threads:[~2001-03-26 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-20  2:10 [Linux-ia64] Unwind problem for __attribute__ noreturn Keith Owens
2001-03-21  0:24 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21  6:03 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  6:53 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21  7:12 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21  7:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21  8:54 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21 17:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 18:48 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:07 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:13 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 19:13 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:26 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-21 19:40 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 19:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 20:00 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 20:38 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-21 22:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-03-21 23:42 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-22 17:00 ` Rich Altmaier
2001-03-23 20:28 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-24  0:58 ` Cary Coutant
2001-03-24  1:27 ` Keith Owens
2001-03-24  1:37 ` Jim Wilson
2001-03-26 22:06 ` DE-DINECHIN,CHRISTOPHE (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
2001-03-26 22:58 ` Cary Coutant [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005353@msgid-missing \
    --to=cary@cup.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox