* PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files
@ 2004-11-05 16:32 Alan Cox
2004-11-05 22:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-05 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
diff --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude -u --new-file --recursive linux.vanilla-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h linux-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h 2004-11-05 15:42:18.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h 2004-11-05 16:26:18.000000000 +0000
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@
* Register new hardware with ide
*/
int ide_register_hw(hw_regs_t *hw, struct hwif_s **hwifp);
+int ide_register_hw_with_fixup(hw_regs_t *hw, struct hwif_s **hwifp, void (*fixup)(struct hwif_s *));
/*
* Set up hw_regs_t structure before calling ide_register_hw (optional)
@@ -1470,6 +1475,7 @@
void (*init_iops)(ide_hwif_t *);
void (*init_hwif)(ide_hwif_t *);
void (*init_dma)(ide_hwif_t *, unsigned long);
+ void (*fixup)(ide_hwif_t *);
u8 channels;
u8 autodma;
ide_pci_enablebit_t enablebits[2];
@@ -1529,6 +1535,8 @@
extern void ide_unregister (unsigned int index);
extern int probe_hwif_init(ide_hwif_t *);
+extern int probe_hwif_init_with_fixup(ide_hwif_t *hwif, void (*fixup)(ide_hwif_t *hwif));
+extern void ide_undecoded_slave(ide_hwif_t *hwif);
static inline void *ide_get_hwifdata (ide_hwif_t * hwif)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files
2004-11-05 16:32 PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files Alan Cox
@ 2004-11-05 22:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-11-05 23:36 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2004-11-05 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide
* there is no ordering of your patches
* they are splitted on file boundary not change boundary
(ie. appling one patch leaves you with kernel which won't compile)
* they are whitespace damaged as usual
:/
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:32, Alan Cox wrote:
> diff --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude -u --new-file --recursive linux.vanilla-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h linux-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h 2004-11-05 15:42:18.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.10rc1/include/linux/ide.h 2004-11-05 16:26:18.000000000 +0000
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@
> * Register new hardware with ide
> */
> int ide_register_hw(hw_regs_t *hw, struct hwif_s **hwifp);
> +int ide_register_hw_with_fixup(hw_regs_t *hw, struct hwif_s **hwifp, void (*fixup)(struct hwif_s *));
>
> /*
> * Set up hw_regs_t structure before calling ide_register_hw (optional)
> @@ -1470,6 +1475,7 @@
> void (*init_iops)(ide_hwif_t *);
> void (*init_hwif)(ide_hwif_t *);
> void (*init_dma)(ide_hwif_t *, unsigned long);
> + void (*fixup)(ide_hwif_t *);
> u8 channels;
> u8 autodma;
> ide_pci_enablebit_t enablebits[2];
> @@ -1529,6 +1535,8 @@
> extern void ide_unregister (unsigned int index);
>
> extern int probe_hwif_init(ide_hwif_t *);
> +extern int probe_hwif_init_with_fixup(ide_hwif_t *hwif, void (*fixup)(ide_hwif_t *hwif));
> +extern void ide_undecoded_slave(ide_hwif_t *hwif);
>
> static inline void *ide_get_hwifdata (ide_hwif_t * hwif)
> {
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files
2004-11-05 22:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2004-11-05 23:36 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-06 0:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2004-11-05 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: linux-ide
On Gwe, 2004-11-05 at 22:02, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * there is no ordering of your patches
> * they are splitted on file boundary not change boundary
> (ie. appling one patch leaves you with kernel which won't compile)
Well I could send you bigger pieces if you want but you objected to that
last time.
> * they are whitespace damaged as usual
Well if you want to be a bigot about the old trailing space caused by
editor auto indenting feel free 8)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files
2004-11-05 23:36 ` Alan Cox
@ 2004-11-06 0:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2004-11-06 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide
On Saturday 06 November 2004 00:36, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2004-11-05 at 22:02, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > * there is no ordering of your patches
> > * they are splitted on file boundary not change boundary
> > (ie. appling one patch leaves you with kernel which won't compile)
>
> Well I could send you bigger pieces if you want but you objected to that
> last time.
all or nothing...
> > * they are whitespace damaged as usual
>
> Well if you want to be a bigot about the old trailing space caused by
> editor auto indenting feel free 8)
sigh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-06 0:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-05 16:32 PATCH: Put the new API functions in the header files Alan Cox
2004-11-05 22:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-11-05 23:36 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-06 0:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox