From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>, Tommy Kelly <linux@tkel.ly>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not needlessly defer commands when using PMP with FBS
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 11:24:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3219ead-b8a7-443e-b7cb-14ecd3ee9f5b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514073858.1175072-10-cassel@kernel.org>
On 2026/05/14 9:39, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> The SATA specification does not allow a non-NCQ command to be issued while
s/SATA/ATA (or ACS)
> an NCQ command is outstanding.
>
> Commit 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation")
> introduced a feature where a deferred non-NCQ command gets issued from a
> workqueue. The design stores a single non-NCQ command per port.
>
> However, when using Port Multipliers (PMPs), specifically PMPs that
> support FIS-Based Switching (FBS), non-NCQ and NCQ commands can be mixed
> on the same port, just not for the same link, see e.g. ata_std_qc_defer()
> which is, and always has operated on a per-link basis.
>
> Therefore, move the deferred_qc from struct ata_port to struct ata_link.
> This way, when using a PMP with FBS, we will not needlessly defer commands
> to all other links, just because one link issued a non-NCQ command while
> having an NCQ command outstanding. Only commands for that specific link
> will be deferred.
>
> Fixes: 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 7:38 [PATCH v5 0/4] ata: fix deferred QC handling for port multipliers Niklas Cassel
2026-05-14 7:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ata: libata-scsi: improve readability of ata_scsi_qc_issue() Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 9:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature for ATA_DEFER_PORT Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 9:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature on PMPs with CBS Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 9:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not needlessly defer commands when using PMP with FBS Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 9:24 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-05-14 10:43 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] ata: fix deferred QC handling for port multipliers Tommy Kelly
2026-05-14 11:17 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 10:33 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-05-18 10:37 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3219ead-b8a7-443e-b7cb-14ecd3ee9f5b@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@tkel.ly \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox