From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, otavio@ossystems.com.br,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:03:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201307021403.57543.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D2BCE5.8060602@free-electrons.com>
Dear Alexandre Belloni,
> Dear Marek,
>
> I don't seem to be hitting that issue. I'm using 3.10rc7. Do you know
> how to reproduce it ?
The check is just redundant, it's not a bug.
> Regards,
>
> On 02/07/2013 02:08, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > The removed check in the read_raw implementation was always true,
> > therefore remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 7 -------
> > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> > b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c index d92c97a..c318eb6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> > *iio_dev,
> >
> > {
> >
> > struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > int ret;
> >
> > - unsigned long mask;
> >
> > if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > @@ -243,12 +242,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
> > *iio_dev,
> >
> > if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> >
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - /* Validate the channel if it doesn't intersect with reserved chans. */
> > - bitmap_set(&mask, chan->channel, 1);
> > - ret = iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(iio_dev, &mask);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * See if there is no buffered operation in progess. If there is,
> > simply * bail out. This can be improved to support both buffered and
> > raw IO at
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 0:08 [PATCH] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw Marek Vasut
2013-07-02 3:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-02 17:58 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-02 9:19 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-02 11:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-07-02 11:53 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-02 12:03 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-07-02 12:49 ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-07-02 16:13 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-02 16:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-02 17:36 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-02 17:42 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-02 17:55 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-03 9:25 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 11:38 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-03 13:58 ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 19:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-02 17:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201307021403.57543.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox