Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: Silent no spi_device_id warnings

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 23:55:56 +0800
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> wrote:

> On 2022/9/19 23:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 22:50:35 +0800
> > Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 2022/9/19 22:46, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:  
> >>> On 9/19/22 16:59, Wei Yongjun wrote:    
> >>>> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>  
> > Hi Wei Yongjun,
> >   
> >>>>
> >>>> Add spi_device_id entries to silent following SPI warnings:  
> > 
> > silence rather than silent (also in patch titles)
> >   
> >>>>
> >>>> SPI driver ad7124 has no spi_device_id for adi,ad7124-4
> >>>> SPI driver ad7124 has no spi_device_id for adi,ad7124-8    
> >>> What generates those warnings?
> >>>     
> >>
> >> Commit 5fa6863ba692 ("spi: Check we have a spi_device_id for each DT
> >> compatible") added a test to check that every SPI driver has a
> >> spi_device_id for each DT compatiable string defined by the driver
> >> and warns if the spi_device_id is missing.  
> > 
> > When sending a series of similar fixes to a given subsystem together
> > it's helpful to group them into a series, so that comments that
> > apply series wide can easily be easily found.
> > 
> > A cover letter is also useful to provide a little more information on
> > what is being fixed.  
> 
> 
> Sure, will update in v3.

On that note.  It's a good idea to let a patch series, even when simple,
sit for at least a few days before sending a new version.

As demonstrated here you run the risk of going through multiple rounds
just because reviews haven't come in yet!  Reviewers will often not
look at all at a series showing rapid version changes, because they take
the view it's not yet stable and it will be more productive to review it
once it is...

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks.
>