Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@analog.com>,
	Mihail Chindris <mihail.chindris@analog.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Tomislav Denis <tomislav.denis@avl.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
	Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@microchip.com>,
	Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:36:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413103631.6ffb90c4@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240330185305.1319844-3-jic23@kernel.org>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 18:52:59 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> 
> Switching to the _scoped() version removes the need for manual
> calling of fwnode_handle_put() in the paths where the code
> exits the loop early. In this case that's all in error paths.
> 
> A slightly less convincing usecase than many as all the failure paths
> are wrapped up in a call to a per fwnode_handle utility function.
> The complexity in that function is sufficient that it makes sense to
> factor it out even if it this new auto cleanup would enable simpler
> returns if the code was inline at the call site. Hence I've left it alone.
> 
> Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
I'm not sure why I didn't pick this one up before now given it has
an RB from Dmitry. Applied.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> index b6b612d733ff..9b69f40beed8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> @@ -825,7 +825,6 @@ static int adc5_get_fw_data(struct adc5_chip *adc)
>  	const struct adc5_channels *adc_chan;
>  	struct iio_chan_spec *iio_chan;
>  	struct adc5_channel_prop prop, *chan_props;
> -	struct fwnode_handle *child;
>  	unsigned int index = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -849,12 +848,10 @@ static int adc5_get_fw_data(struct adc5_chip *adc)
>  	if (!adc->data)
>  		adc->data = &adc5_data_pmic;
>  
> -	device_for_each_child_node(adc->dev, child) {
> +	device_for_each_child_node_scoped(adc->dev, child) {
>  		ret = adc5_get_fw_channel_data(adc, &prop, child, adc->data);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			fwnode_handle_put(child);
> +		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		}
>  
>  		prop.scale_fn_type =
>  			adc->data->adc_chans[prop.channel].scale_fn_type;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-13  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-30 18:52 [PATCH v6 0/8] IIO: Use device_for_each_child_scope() Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] iio: adc: mcp3564: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:52 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-13  9:36   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] iio: adc: stm32: Fixing err code to not indicate success Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 12:31   ` Fabrice Gasnier
2024-04-13  9:37     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] iio: adc: stm32: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-13  9:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] iio: dac: ad3552r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04  9:14   ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-06 10:18     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-30 18:53 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] iio: dac: ad5770r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04  9:11   ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-06 10:19     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240413103631.6ffb90c4@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cosmin.tanislav@analog.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
    --cc=mihail.chindris@analog.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=tomislav.denis@avl.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox