* Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels")
@ 2024-09-02 10:19 Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-09-02 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol @ 2024-09-02 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: linux-iio
Hello Jonathan,
accepted patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Remove duplicata code between labels") is breaking inv_mpu6050 interrupt handling, forcing call of inv_reset_fifo() for each interrupt processing.
Can you revert it inside testing branch? Is there a specific standardize way of asking to revert patch or is it OK like this?
Thanks.
Best regards,
JB
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels")
2024-09-02 10:19 Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels") Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
@ 2024-09-02 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-02 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-09-02 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol; +Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:19:52 +0000
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> accepted patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Remove duplicata code between labels") is breaking inv_mpu6050 interrupt handling, forcing call of inv_reset_fifo() for each interrupt processing.
>
> Can you revert it inside testing branch? Is there a specific standardize way of asking to revert patch or is it OK like this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> JB
>
This is fine. I'll do it when on right machine later today.
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels")
2024-09-02 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2024-09-02 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-09-02 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol, linux-iio
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:36:19 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:19:52 +0000
> Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jonathan,
> >
> > accepted patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Remove duplicata code between labels") is breaking inv_mpu6050 interrupt handling, forcing call of inv_reset_fifo() for each interrupt processing.
> >
> > Can you revert it inside testing branch? Is there a specific standardize way of asking to revert patch or is it OK like this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > JB
> >
>
> This is fine. I'll do it when on right machine later today.
>
> Jonathan
>
Done.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-02 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-02 10:19 Revert patch 1908f13c4682 ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6060: Remove duplicata code between labels") Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2024-09-02 10:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-02 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox